Fake Food Alert: The Global Mafia’s New Attack on Our Health

by Paul Cudenec

The global mafia is trying to replace our real food with a fake GM variety without even telling us.

They want to change the regulations so that natural food and genetically modified lab food are legally the same!

This is not a “conspiracy theory” but a very real proposal currently being pushed by corporate-controlled authorities.

It’s happening in Australia and New Zealand – long-standing colonies of the dark, slave-owning empire, often used as testing grounds for new forms of oppression.

But you can bet that – if they get away with it – this will be rolled out everywhere.

Researcher Kate Mason is sounding the alarm, calling on people in Australia and New Zealand to submit their objections before the fast-approaching deadline of Tuesday 10 September (6pm Canberra time). You can read her report here and watch her video here.

She explains that FSANZ, the Australian and New Zealand Food Safety Authority, is proposing changes to the Food Standard that would deregulate genetically modified foods and remove the need for consumer labelling.

Kate warns that this would give the global processed food industry the ability to self-regulate all genetically modified foods!

“Yet the gene-edited foods produced using CRISPR, which FSANZ calls NBTs (New Breeding Techniques), have little history of safe use as food and their future effects on health and welfare are unknown.”

“FSANZ claims that genetically modified foods are the same as natural conventional foods, that they have the same ‘characteristics’. Under this definition, lab meat can be seen as the same as meat, because the lab meat has synthetic vitamins and minerals added that match the natural levels of vitamins and minerals in meat.

“The audience is being asked to accept the hypothesis that synthetic is the same as natural. It is not!”

Bob Phelps, director of campaign group GeneEthics, added: “FSANZ would amend the definitions of ‘food produced using genetic engineering’ and ‘genetic technology’ in the Food Standards Code to exempt genetically modified organisms, fermentations and chemicals used to make synthetic foods from any regulation.

“The food industry does not have to notify FSANZ and can therefore avoid any assessment, regulation and labelling.

“So genetically modified fake meat, fake milk, synthetic seafood, processing aids, additives, nutrients, colorants and flavorings – even those not yet invented – would be sold in secret.

“The consumer would lose the right to know and choose what he or she feeds his or her family.

“Genetically edited foods would also vastly increase the supply of highly refined and ultra-processed foods (UPFs), which are rightly blamed for rising rates of disease – obesity, diabetes, colorectal cancer and heart problems – even in young people.

“FSANZ is ignoring the health, welfare and safety of families, with decisions that unfairly favour the global junk food industry and its addictive, genetically modified, highly refined and ultra-processed fake foods.”

An official document sets out the motives behind this attack on our health in rather blunt terms, listing “benefits” for the food industry such as “increased production efficiency” and – crucially – “higher profits”.

FSANZ has found from its research that there is a ‘lack of knowledge’ among the public about the regulation of genetically modified foods, but does not appear to be planning to rectify this.

Kate asks: “If FSANZ is aware that the vast majority of Australians and New Zealanders are unaware of NBTs, why are they proceeding with a community consultation?

“If consumers do not agree that GM foods will reduce climate change, why has FSANZ included this as a benefit to consumers in their cost and benefit document?

“If consumers want regulation, why is FSANZ proposing to remove regulation of genetically modified foods?”

People can answer questions here on the FSANZ portal or email their own submission to FSANZ: [email protected].

Please pass this information on to your contacts in the relevant countries.

We are talking about a criminal attack on the health and happiness of humanity.

I would add that the official language used in presenting these sinister proposals is very familiar to anyone who has delved into the world of global criminocracy.

Take for example this sentence from Kate: “Adopting a forward-looking and flexible approach to technology development will facilitate industry innovation.”

Regarding the word “agile,” Klaus Schwab of the WEF – that notorious public front for the global mafia – has written about the need for “agile governance,” arguing that “the pace of technological development and some characteristics of technologies make previous policy-making cycles and processes inadequate.”

He says: “The idea of ​​reforming governance models to deal with new technologies is not
new, but the urgency to do so is much greater in light of the power of today’s emerging technologies… the concept of agile governance attempts to match the agility, fluidity, flexibility and adaptability of the technologies themselves and of the private sector actors that embrace them”.

And the word ‘innovation’ is constantly being used by the global Leviathan.

As I explain in my 2023 book The Great Racketit is used repeatedly by The Commonwealth (Empire), which even had a Commonwealth Innovation platform, with 27 ‘partner’ organisations.

That seems to be gone or hidden now, but you can still view the archived page here.

The World Health Organization proudly tops the list, followed by the African Development Bank Group, the Global Partnership for Sustainable Development Data, the United Nations and five of its various sub-organizations.

We also find organisations such as Bloomberg Philanthropies (founded by American billionaire Michael Bloomberg), the International Trade Centre (“a multilateral agency with a joint mandate with the World Trade Organisation and the United Nations through the UN Conference on Trade and Development”), Global Innovation Fund, a specialist in impact investing, and NDC Partnership, a major player in the world of “climate finance”.

In Converging against the criminocracy I note that the term “innovation” has been used by the WEF, the United Nations Development Programme, the Global System for Mobile Communications Association, the Church of England’s Social Impact Investment Programme and British International Investment.

I also note that the Swiss-based entity Edmond de Rothschild, which is pushing the whole agenda of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, has set up a strategic partnership in the field of ‘innovative food’, technology linked to ‘alternative proteins’, new agricultural systems and the creation of ‘digital solutions’ for food.

In my latest book, Against the dark, oppressive empire!I would like to mention the Peres Center for Peace and Innovation in Israel, whose international directors include the liquor trade “philanthropist” Charles Bronfman, Baroness Ariane de Rothschild and the late Sir Evelyn de Rothschild.

If you don’t see what we’re dealing with, you really haven’t been paying attention!

(Audio version)