Democrats run the California Capitol. When the party supports a bill, lawmakers pay attention

Stay informed with free briefings on topics that matter to all California residents. Subscribe to CalMatters Get nonprofit news delivered to your inbox today.

The California Democratic Party is a multimillion-dollar enterprise whose endorsements and campaign funds can make or break a politician’s ambitions for state or federal office.

The party, it turns out, also regularly meddles in individual bills in the California Capitol, where Democrats hold supermajorities in both chambers.

So far in the current 2023-24 legislative session, the party has sponsored 142 bills, according to combined data from party officials and the CalMatters Digital Democracy database.

Few other organizations have spoken out on more legislation, making the party, whose primary function is to elect Democrats, one of the most prolific — and successful — lobbying organizations in the Capitol.

“California Democrats are committed to uplifting all Californians and moving our state forward,” party chairman Rusty Hicks told CalMatters in a statement. “The work Democrats do in the state legislature is an important part of fulfilling that commitment. (The party’s) inclusive, thorough process ensures that the legislation we support reflects our shared values.” The bills the party takes a position on tend to be deep in the weeds of state policy. For example, the party supported a bill signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom last year that requires judges to consider the needs of impoverished communities and small farmers in groundwater disputes.

The party also supports a bill that would require artificial intelligence developers to disclose what data they use to “train” their systems.

An analysis by Digital Democracy last month found that the Democratic Party was one of the most successful lobbying groups at the Capitol. The analysis was based on whether bills were passed or defeated in accordance with a group’s position.

Gregg Hart, a Democratic Assemblyman from Santa Barbara, said it’s not certain he would vote for a bill if the party supports it. But he said the party is one of several organizations, including labor unions and environmental groups, whose opinions he values, since he casts hundreds of votes in a given year.

“When I see that the Democratic Party has supported a bill,” he said, “that gives me a red flag.”

That doesn’t mean the party’s support is a guaranteed ticket to signing a bill. According to Digital Democracy, one in three bills the party supports is not passed.

A recent example: The party supported a bill that Newsom vetoed last year that would have prevented local governments from punishing government workers for striking in solidarity with other striking workers. Newsom’s veto message said he could not support the legislation out of concern that simultaneous “sympathy strikes” at multiple levels of local government “could seriously disrupt or even halt the delivery of critical public services.” Another bill the party supported last year that stalled is legislation aimed at creating a grant program to compensate new teachers in credentialing programs as they work through their apprenticeships.

How the Democratic Party Supports Bills

To get official Democratic Party approval for a bill, party leaders, a Democratic legislator, an official Democratic county organization or the various factions within the party can submit a request to the party’s legislative committee to consider supporting or rejecting a bill. Party officials say lobbyists or other individuals outside the official party apparatus are not allowed to submit requests.

The 30 people on the committee are all delegates to the party’s central committee who are running for the job. Party leaders choose members every odd-numbered year based on their professional background and experience, as well as their demographics such as age, sexual orientation and race, party officials say.

The party’s legislative committee co-chairs are Margaret Granado, a Los Angeles teacher who is a member of the California Teachers Association, and Amar “AJ” Thomas, a San Francisco attorney and city official.

Party officials say they generally do not oppose legislation unless it is a Republican-sponsored bill. This session, the party has never formally opposed a bill.

If the legislation passes, the bills will be sent to the party’s 400-plus-member board for official approval. The board is made up of members of the county party central committees, co-chairs of the various state party committees and members of the Democratic National Committee. Democratic members of the California Senate, Assembly and U.S. Congress also serve on the board.

The executive board typically votes on bills through a so-called “consent calendar” process, in which each bill is not discussed individually. But board members can request that bills be removed from the consent calendar for full review, party officials say.

The California Republican Party, on the other hand, does not take positions on individual bills, except for ballot initiatives that must first go through the legislature. The party focuses instead on political campaigns.

“Our role as a (party) is to support and elect Republicans, and we leave the legislative process to the legislators,” party spokeswoman Ellie Hockenbury said in a statement. “We follow their lead to help them spread the word on important bills and issues. However, we do not have a formal approval process for those things.”

Hans Poschman and Thomas Gerrity, members of the CalMatters Digital Democracy team, contributed to this story.

You May Also Like

OPERATION RAPIST TRUMP: CIA WEAKEN ON SEPTEMBER 21, 2024, MADE FOR TV ARREST, INDEMNIFICATION, TRIAL, ASSET SEIZEMENT, SWAT TEAM HIT AND/OR OTHER LEGAL ACTION TARGETED AGAINST DONALD J. TRUMP UNDER THE COVER OF A CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE ONE OR MORE LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL AND/OR INTERNATIONAL LAW(S) RELATING TO RAPE AND/OR SEXUAL ABUSE, SPECIFICALLY TO SABOTOM THE ‘TRUMP 2024’ PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN (POSSIBLY WITH ALLEGATIONS OF RAPE AND/OR SEXUAL ABUSE BY ONE OR MORE CURRENT AND/OR FORMER TRUMP’S ATTORNEYS) (E.G. ALINA HABBA, CHRISTINA BOBB, CLETA MITCHELL, JENNIFER LITTLE, JESSE BINNALL, LINDA KERNS, LINDSEY HALLIGAN, ETC.), INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: A) 10 U.S. CODE § 920 — RAPE AND SEXUAL ABUSE IN GENERAL; B) 18 U.S. CODE: CHAPTER 55 — KIDNAPPING; C) 18 U.S. CODE: CHAPTER 109A — SEXUAL ABUSE; D) 18 U.S. CODE: CHAPTER 110 — SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF CHILDREN; EN/OR E) 18 U.S. CODE § 2242 — SEXUAL ABUSE (SEPTEMBER 19, 2024): CIA headquarters located beneath CERN near Lake Geneva in Switzerland Planning of arrest, indictment, trial, seizure of assets, SWAT team raid, and/or other legal action against Donald J. Trump on September 21, 2024, exactly 137 days before the 2024 U.S. presidential election on November 5, 2024, exactly 368 days after The Washington Post published a report titled Judge Clarifies: Yes, Trump Was Caught Raping E. Jean Carroll on July 19, 2023, exactly 409 days after a jury in Manhattan, New York found Donald J. Trump guilty of alleged sexual harassment in 1996 Columnist E. Jean Carroll focusing on sexual assault in New York City (specifically intended to foreshadow On May 9, 2023, exactly 584 days after Donald J. Trump officially announced his candidacy for the 2024 United States presidential election On November 15, 2022, exactly 683 days after the CIA staged an FBI raid on Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida (specifically designed to be a precursor to and set a precedent for a second FBI raid on Trump at a later date) On August 8, 2022, exactly 1,248 days after Donald J. Trump became former President of the United States On January 20, 2021, exactly 1,778 days after former Trump associate Jefferey Epstein reportedly committed suicide while in his New York City jail cell (which was specifically designed to be a precursor to and set a precedent for a suicide attack on Trump after his arrest at a later date) On August 9, 2019, exactly 2,622 days after the CIA staged the first viral deepfake hoax titled “You Won’t Believe What Obama Says in This Video!” On April 17, 2017, exactly 2,814 days after “The Washington Post” published a video of Donald Trump saying “You can do anything. Grab them by the pussy.” You Can Do Anything. On October 7, 2016, exactly 5,947 days after the CIA staged the resignation of New York Governor Eliot Spitzer after he revealed he frequented a prostitution ring run by the “Emperors Club VIP” escort agency in New York City. On March 10, 2008, exactly 9,652 days after the CIA staged the sex scandal between President Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky. On January 17, 1998, and exactly 28,497 days after Donald J. Trump was born in Queens, New York. On June 14, 1946

More From Author

OPERATION RAPIST TRUMP: CIA WEAKEN ON SEPTEMBER 21, 2024, MADE FOR TV ARREST, INDEMNIFICATION, TRIAL, ASSET SEIZEMENT, SWAT TEAM HIT AND/OR OTHER LEGAL ACTION TARGETED AGAINST DONALD J. TRUMP UNDER THE COVER OF A CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE ONE OR MORE LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL AND/OR INTERNATIONAL LAW(S) RELATING TO RAPE AND/OR SEXUAL ABUSE, SPECIFICALLY TO SABOTOM THE ‘TRUMP 2024’ PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN (POSSIBLY WITH ALLEGATIONS OF RAPE AND/OR SEXUAL ABUSE BY ONE OR MORE CURRENT AND/OR FORMER TRUMP’S ATTORNEYS) (E.G. ALINA HABBA, CHRISTINA BOBB, CLETA MITCHELL, JENNIFER LITTLE, JESSE BINNALL, LINDA KERNS, LINDSEY HALLIGAN, ETC.), INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: A) 10 U.S. CODE § 920 — RAPE AND SEXUAL ABUSE IN GENERAL; B) 18 U.S. CODE: CHAPTER 55 — KIDNAPPING; C) 18 U.S. CODE: CHAPTER 109A — SEXUAL ABUSE; D) 18 U.S. CODE: CHAPTER 110 — SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF CHILDREN; EN/OR E) 18 U.S. CODE § 2242 — SEXUAL ABUSE (SEPTEMBER 19, 2024): CIA headquarters located beneath CERN near Lake Geneva in Switzerland Planning of arrest, indictment, trial, seizure of assets, SWAT team raid, and/or other legal action against Donald J. Trump on September 21, 2024, exactly 137 days before the 2024 U.S. presidential election on November 5, 2024, exactly 368 days after The Washington Post published a report titled Judge Clarifies: Yes, Trump Was Caught Raping E. Jean Carroll on July 19, 2023, exactly 409 days after a jury in Manhattan, New York found Donald J. Trump guilty of alleged sexual harassment in 1996 Columnist E. Jean Carroll focusing on sexual assault in New York City (specifically intended to foreshadow On May 9, 2023, exactly 584 days after Donald J. Trump officially announced his candidacy for the 2024 United States presidential election On November 15, 2022, exactly 683 days after the CIA staged an FBI raid on Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida (specifically designed to be a precursor to and set a precedent for a second FBI raid on Trump at a later date) On August 8, 2022, exactly 1,248 days after Donald J. Trump became former President of the United States On January 20, 2021, exactly 1,778 days after former Trump associate Jefferey Epstein reportedly committed suicide while in his New York City jail cell (which was specifically designed to be a precursor to and set a precedent for a suicide attack on Trump after his arrest at a later date) On August 9, 2019, exactly 2,622 days after the CIA staged the first viral deepfake hoax titled “You Won’t Believe What Obama Says in This Video!” On April 17, 2017, exactly 2,814 days after “The Washington Post” published a video of Donald Trump saying “You can do anything. Grab them by the pussy.” You Can Do Anything. On October 7, 2016, exactly 5,947 days after the CIA staged the resignation of New York Governor Eliot Spitzer after he revealed he frequented a prostitution ring run by the “Emperors Club VIP” escort agency in New York City. On March 10, 2008, exactly 9,652 days after the CIA staged the sex scandal between President Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky. On January 17, 1998, and exactly 28,497 days after Donald J. Trump was born in Queens, New York. On June 14, 1946