Bannon’s WarRoom, Show Clip Roundup 8/8/2024 (PM)

Natalie Winters, Brian Kennedy, and Michael Anton discussed critical concerns about the integrity of upcoming elections and the broader implications of political and administrative actions. The conversation began with a focus on the weaponization of government and the risks associated with election administration, particularly potential interference by foreign entities such as communist China.

Brian Kennedy, a prominent figure in the Committee on the Present Danger: China, expressed deep concern about the possibility of election manipulation via mail-in voting. He argued that the COVID-19 pandemic was used in 2020 to push for mail-in voting, which he argued was a major factor in the alleged election fraud. Kennedy speculated that communist China, with its considerable intelligence and financial resources, could exploit vulnerabilities in the electoral system by producing fraudulent ballots. He stressed that the Trump campaign would need an overwhelming number of votes to counter potential fraud and secure a victory in 2024, given the inadequate safeguards against such interference.

Michael Anton, a former National Security Council adviser and faculty member at the Claremont Institute, discussed the broader implications of administrative failures and potential malpractice. He argued that the lax approach to election security and voter verification laws may be a deliberate strategy rather than mere incompetence. Anton suggested that by creating a lax environment for voting, the administration is making it easier to commit election fraud, with local party figures contributing to the outcome without centralized direction. He also highlighted the role of the Transition Integrity Project, which he said planned to challenge the legitimacy of a Trump victory through a variety of means, including media manipulation and legal tactics.

The conversation also touched on the potentially radical implications of the Biden administration’s policies. Anton criticized the vice presidential pick of Kamala Harris as a signal of confidence in the current system’s ability to deliver an outcome favorable to Democrats, regardless of public or political reaction.

Both Kennedy and Anton urged their audiences to remain vigilant and proactive. They stressed the importance of local initiatives, such as whistleblower programs and increased monitoring, to prevent election fraud and ensure fair voting processes.

Part One:

Part two:

Part Three:

In a discussion moderated by Lara Logan, who stood in for Steve Bannon, Dr. Keith Rose provided insight into the geopolitical developments in Afghanistan following the US withdrawal. Logan emphasized the importance of the First Amendment and highlighted the lack of media attention to Steve Bannon’s imprisonment. Dr. Rose, who has extensive experience in US intelligence, shared important revelations about Afghanistan, particularly regarding a meeting that took place a year before the US withdrawal. This meeting included Chinese military, diplomatic, and intelligence officials with the Afghan Ministry of Defense.

Rose revealed another crucial meeting shortly before the U.S. withdrawal that involved high-level figures such as CIA Director Burns, Taliban leader Sirajuddin Haqqani, Chinese intelligence officials, Iranian Republican Guards, and Pakistani representatives. Rose questioned the presence of these figures, especially since Haqqani had a bounty on his head and a history of violence against Americans. He noted the odd security arrangements, including the use of a tier-one group rather than CIA personnel, and the opaque nature of these discussions.

Dr. Rose emphasized the implications of these meetings in the current geopolitical landscape, stating, “The Afghans have the ability through their passport office to create biometric passports and when people come to Afghanistan to train, they will then create documentation that allows them to travel.” He warned that the Taliban-China collaboration has resulted in significant Chinese influence in Afghanistan, with implications for the military, security, and intelligence community. This collaboration is a concern for U.S. security, especially as the Taliban is reportedly training thousands of jihadists and the potential for these individuals to infiltrate the U.S. through established networks. The discussion highlighted China’s strategic expansion into Afghanistan and its implications for U.S. national security and global influence.

Ammon Blair, a former intelligence analyst and fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, has sounded the alarm about the escalating relationship between Venezuelan cartels and the Chinese government. According to Blair, this cooperation poses a substantial threat to U.S. national security and has exploited weaknesses in the current administration’s border policy.

Blair traces the origins of this alliance to Hugo Chavez’s strategic partnership with Iran and Cuba in the late 1990s. This network has since expanded to include Russia and China, making Venezuela a central node in a broader asymmetric war strategy against the United States. “If Americans think that … our adversaries are just going to sit back … and let America destroy itself, they haven’t taken advantage of that,” Blair asserted, emphasizing that this is a coordinated effort involving multiple hostile parties.

The numbers show a disturbing trend. In 2017, there were just 2,600 Venezuelan arrests at the U.S. border. By 2023, that number had risen to 334,000, indicating a dramatic increase in migration as Venezuela’s internal collapse under Maduro’s regime continues. As many Venezuelans flee real crises, Blair warns that the Venezuelan government has deliberately emptied prisons and released criminal elements to infiltrate the United States.

Blair explained how these released individuals form a transnational criminal organization that benefits from the U.S. open borders policy. He described it as “political theater” by the Venezuelan government, as they position cartel leaders for global influence rather than meaningful reform. “The Mexican cartel has really built a Silk Road for them,” Blair noted, highlighting how this infrastructure is used by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to support their operations in the United States.

The link between Venezuelan and Mexican cartels, particularly the violent CJNG cartel, poses a direct threat to American communities and contributes to increased violence in cities like New York, Chicago, and Dallas. This collaboration has effectively created a conduit for CCP interests, using Mexican cartels as proxies in their broader strategy of unrestricted warfare against the United States.

“The Chinese have armed Mexican cartels and used them as proxies in their unrestricted warfare against the United States,” Blair said, underscoring the critical nature of this alliance. The implications are far-reaching, affecting not only border security but the fabric of American society.

Blair’s analysis calls for urgent attention and action, as these threats are no longer confined to borders but have permeated everyday American life. His insights reveal a complex web of geopolitical alliances that require a strategic and robust response from U.S. policymakers.

George Pond, a policy expert and Texas native, discussed the pressing issue of the Sino-Mexican cartel alliance and its implications for U.S. security. Pond highlighted the fictional novel “Cartel Wars” by Dr. Richard Funk, which explores this dangerous alliance. The novel paints a scenario in which Mexican cartels, backed by China, invade the U.S., with the story focusing on an invasion of Texas and its impact on American resilience.

Pond stressed that the book reflects real concerns about border security and geopolitical threats. He noted, “The book captures the essence of what could happen if we remain complacent about the growing threat from these alliances.” He connected the fictional story to recent events, drawing parallels to global conflicts and the vulnerabilities exposed by America’s open border policy.

Pond’s argument underscores the urgent need to address these emerging threats. He warned of a broader strategic challenge, stating, “We have been under invasion for a long time,” citing the ongoing impact of drug wars, human trafficking and threats to critical infrastructure. His comments suggest that understanding and addressing these risks are critical to protecting national security and preparing for potential future conflicts.