Jesus of Galilee, Robert Faurisson, and Gary Webb – John de Nugent

One of my favorite white heroes — Gary Webb (See below).

 

…..Lots of hacking of my computer and my website — my apologies.

I wish to thank my most recent donors:

— 29 September 2024 $333 via PayPal from C in Germany

— 26 September 2024 $25 Amazon gift card from T in Florida

— 24 September 2024 $106 via PayPal from M in France

— 22 September 2024 $55 via CashApp from K in Massachusetts

— 16 September 2024 $105 via PayPal from M in France

— 7 September 2024 $55 via CashApp from K in Massachusetts

— 7 September 2024 $100 from J in Indiana via Western Union

— 5 September 2024 $865 via PayPal from M in France

— 4 September 2024 $100 from J in Indiana via Western Union

— 30 August 2024 $55 via CashApp from K in Massachusetts

 

……Jesus was white and Jesus was real

I recommend readers read (or listen to) my version of Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin to understand that I revered Jesus in that life as Adolf Hitler, just as I do in this one as John de Nugent. Nothing has changed. (See also below.)

I am radically opposed, in my last life and in this one, to portraying and seeing Jesus as a true, believing jew or as any descendant of some royal family trees.

.

This judaization of Jesus was part and parcel of how Saul coopted the revolutionary, ego-opposing new faith, which, because it exposed jewry, could have also destroyed jewry.

The white masses (who even in an agnostic age all know something of Jesus, celebrate Christmas and often Easter, too, and mostly still hold Christian weddings and funerals) see Jesus as an enemy of the jews, working from within, and not AS a jew.

My goal is to teach new values and doctrines, start a new religion, and advance said RELIGION in order to smash our enemy before he smashes us. We can certainly agree on what the jews has in store for us, and that no one until now has dejudaized the most famous man on earth, Jesus the Galilean from Galil ha goyim.

If one googles Jesus, you get almost 3.5 BILLION search results:

About 3,470,000,000 results (0.35 seconds)

Hitler: 474 million results (a half-billion).

Jesus was a national socialist. The world needs to realize this.

I deny vigorously that Jesus never existed. And it was Saul who created “Christianity,” a religion about Jesus and not the religion OF Jesus. I consider my continuing veneration of Jesus — whom the jews say in the Talmud was real but wicked and blasphemous and whom they loathe and defame — to be strategically, historically and spiritually correct.

In fact, my five years with the Jehovah’s Witnesses 1970-75 were bearable because of my reading the New Testament in the original koiné Greek to try to get at who Jesus really was behind all the accretions to the story.

In fact, for me Jesus was one of the great heroes of human history, attacking and exposing — especially for OUR race, but also for all earthlings of all races — the psychopathic danger posed by Judaism.

When Jesus’ primary goal of radically reforming Judaism failed, He then went to His secondary plan, which was to 1) beconme beloved and revered, and 2) goad and provoke the enemy jew establishment into bringing about His own murder, thus to expose the jews for who they truly are, the brothers of Satan and the sons of the demonic Yahweh.

“You are from the the father of the Devil” — John 8:44. Since the Devil is a prideful, fallen angel, and angels with free will were created by God, then the Devil’s father was Yahweh.

This is actually Jesus denouncing not just the jew leaders, but also the Devil — and his father, the savage Yahweh.

Pontius Pilate is shown puzzled by Jesus after He has been whipped and brought back to the governor’s palace. Jesus says nothing to escape crucifixion, and clams up.

In view of the fact that crucifixion was ghastly in its painfulness and duration — hours or even days — this decision was as noble as that of the 300 Spartans.

“Jews, do your worst. I preach peace, love, humility, forgiveness and compassion, and you jews murder me for it.”

Bart Ehrman PhD (Princeton Theological Seminary) was an Evangelical Christian until he began studying the New Testament and discovered serious contradictions in it and even that the religion of Jesus — show real remorse for your sins to be saved — was not the religion about Jesus that Saul cooked up, where Jesus becomes like an animal sacrifice in the Temple, and, extrapolating from that notion, and the belief is taught that believing He died for our sins is what saves us.

As Bart Ehrman, PhD correctly says, since many of the jewish masses and the disciples believed Jesus was the Messiah, and “mesiah” for them meant an earthly jewish king who would expel the Romans, they were shocked when Jesus did not fulfill any of those martial expectations but instead submitted peacefully to arrest and wordlessly accepted His crucifixion.

Along comes Saul with his doctrine that Jesus sacrificed himself — like any rabbit or sheep in the Temple whose throat is cut and put on an altar to appease an angry god. Saul was scrambling to claim that His death was not a very bizarre and shocking bad end that suggested Jesus that was just yet another false messiah, but instead His blood brought world redemption — for all believers in Saul’s teaching.

In reality, the death of Jesus was both especially heroic and yet also just one of many millions of murders by the jews of truth-tellers.

This was a near-murder, committed by three young jewish toughs (from the jewish Betar terrorist organization) against one aging man, Professor Robert Faurisson, outside his own house in Vichy, France (and no one was arrested!):

I had just met Faurisson for the first time a week before in Washington DC and a few days later also in California at an IHR conference. The professor stood about 5’7″.

Kicked repeatedly in the head and jaw by those three jewish psychopaths, he easily could have died.

Btw, Ehrman, now a self-proclaimed atheist, is certain that Jesus was a real person, was an itinerant preacher (one of many during a period of longing for the Messiah and hatred of the Romans), that He was indeed executed by the Romans, that he never said He was God, only on a mission from God, and that He preached salvation (going to heaven at death, and not facing divine wrath) via good works, true remorse and restitution, which is perfectly rational, not the mumbo-jumbo of Saul’s psycho notion that we must go to hell and burn forever because Adam and Eve ate the apple in 4000 BC, with Jesus sacrificing Himself to end God’s wrath.

This whole thing was so ghastly and convoluted that Lloyd George, the famous WWI British PM and later friend of Adolf Hitler, said this Adamic-sin/crucifixion-sacrifice stuff made him into an atheist.

For me, Ehrman’s atheism is simply stupid in our time when there has been a massive accumulation of evidence via NDEs and reincarnation studies at the University of Virginia Medical School that life absolutely does go on for everyone, including the wicked, and that a loving being does greet most people at death.

And Ehrman’s denial of the miracles of Jesus is equally unrealistic. How does a penniless Galilean enthrall the illiterate jewish masses if not by 1) being obviously an existing, real human being, and 2) doing such extraordinary things that the crowd is abuzz and the word spreads like wildfire that the new preacher has special powers?

Btw, others performed miracles, among them most notably Apollonius of Tyana:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollonius_of_Tyana

The scholarly consensus, even among atheists and agnostics, is that Jesus did exist: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christ_myth_theory …. just as a real Henry Ford, by vision, hard work, the overcoming of setbacks, a humane attitude toward his workers, and self-education (coming from a Michigan farm family, he never went to college, and never studied engineering or business), created the gigantic Ford Motor Company. 🙂 (And he was also a vociferous enemy of jewry and a believer in reincarnation, as my website has proven.)

The most famous Roman historian was  Tacitus, who wrote around AD 100 the Annals.

Such indeed were the precautions of human wisdom. The next thing was to seek means of propitiating the gods, and recourse was had to the Sibylline books, by the direction of which prayers were offered to Vulcanus, Ceres, and Proserpina. Juno, too, was entreated by the matrons, first, in the Capitol, then on the nearest part of the coast, whence water was procured to sprinkle the fane and image of the goddess. And there were sacred banquets and nightly vigils celebrated by married women. But all human efforts, all the lavish gifts of the emperor, and the propitiations of the gods, did not banish the sinister belief that the conflagration was the result of an order. Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular.

.

Accordingly, an arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of firing the city, as of hatred against mankind. Mockery of every sort was added to their deaths. Covered with the skins of beasts, they were torn by dogs and perished, or were nailed to crosses, or were doomed to the flames and burnt, to serve as a nightly illumination, when daylight had expired.

.

Nero offered his gardens for the spectacle, and was exhibiting a show in the circus, while he mingled with the people in the dress of a charioteer or stood aloft on a car. Hence, even for criminals who deserved extreme and exemplary punishment, there arose a feeling of compassion; for it was not, as it seemed, for the public good, but to glut one man’s cruelty, that they were being destroyed.

.

In fact, national socialism is specifically the fanatical affirmation that, as Thomas Carlyle said, “history is the biography of great men.” The masses, and we see this now more than ever, unfortunately are too often like putty — illogical lumps of hair, skin, muscle, fat and bone — whom both good and evil leaders can mold. Leaders must arise to mold that putty so the nation survives and thrives in a dangerous world.

So what we need are truly idealistic leaders who can mold the putty people, not that we WANT putty people, but putty is regrettably what they are, capable of swallowing the most incredibly threadbare lies as well as the most noble truths!

In fact, national socialism is the systematic grooming of future leaders. In school, in the Hitler Youth, in the Winter Help Works, in the Reich Labor Service, and in the military, we taught males and females to be vigorous, self-confident physically fit, warm and helpful comrades, and both followers and leaders. This meant really “walking the walk,” living out our NS values and applying our noble teachings to overcome every obstacle and win.

 

.

…..When Jesus was depicted by early Christians shown, it was always as an Aryan, never with black hair and a hooked nose!

It just never occurred to anyone, THEN OR NOW, that a man who gave His life for love, forgiveness, humility and justice — and denounced lies, vengeance, domination, materialism and greed could possibly look like a Jew.

This is how the early Christians remembered the evil Paul, who was also in Rome, as very jewy.

This is how they saw Jesus and Mary:

Close-up of the boy Jesus

 Traversing the sky in a chariot, Jesus, the blond risen Lord, has sunbeams emerging from his head  

 

Close-up of “the Lord”

But of course if Jesus incarnated in Palestine in order to reform the Jews, He would not wish to appear as a golden-haired, six-foot-tall Swede to them, looking like a total foreigner, but instead look similar to the lighter-skinned, -haired and -eyed Jews among them who lived at that time.

One can assume that Jesus did not look extraordinary, or else there would be stories in the New Testament about, say, how tall Hew was, and how handsome He was, or that He was ugly, or plain, in the other case… or what wide shoulders He had, etc.  It seems that His appearance was not the most striking thing about him, but rather the things He said and did that were extraordinary.

Jesus in a recent Hollywood movie — always with very light-brown or near-blond hair, We just cannot imagine a divine man or angel any other way.

Jesus as portrayed by English actor Robert Powell of Manchester in Franco Zeffirelli’s excellent 1977 British-Italian miniseries “Jesus of Nazareth”

Jesus as seen by the Mormons, resolute and manly

  Now here is a real Jew –the diabolical and cunning David Axelrod, elections guru who in 2008 and 2012 got Barack Hussein Obama elected president

:

Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland Security under Bush II

……The Jews of today do not descend from the Jews back then

According to the Israeli bestseller The Invention of the Jewish People by Professor Shlomo Sand of Tel Aviv, most Jews today descend not from the Jews of Bible times but from either Khazars (Huns and Turks) if they are Ashkenazim (light-skinned European Jews), or if they are Sephardim (swarthy Middle Eastern Jews), then from various Arabic or otherwise Semitic peoples in northern Africa or the Middle East whom rabbis converted to Judaism during a very long phase when Judaism was in fact very much a missionary religion, converting people to itself, and very unlike today.

.https://www.amazon.com/Invention-Jewish-People-Shlomo-Sand/dp/1844676234

A historical tour de force, The Invention of the Jewish People offers a groundbreaking account of Jewish and Israeli history. Exploding the myth that there was a forced Jewish exile in the first century at the hands of the Romans, Israeli historian Shlomo Sand argues that most modern Jews descend from converts, whose native lands were scattered across the Middle East and Eastern Europe.

In this iconoclastic work, which spent nineteen weeks on the Israeli bestseller list and won the coveted Aujourd’hui Award in France, Sand provides the intellectual foundations for a new vision of Israel’s future.

Shlomo Sand studied history at the University of Tel Aviv and at the École des hautes études en sciences sociales in Paris.

He currently teaches contemporary history at the University of Tel Aviv.

His books include The Invention of the Jewish People, On the Nation and the Jewish People, L’Illusion du politique: Georges Sorel et le débat intellectuel 1900 (= “The Illusion of Politics: Georges Sorel and the Intellectual Debate in 1900”), Georges Sorel en son temps ( = “Georges Sorel in his time”), Le XXe siècle à l’écran ( = “The twentieth century on the screen”) and Les Mots et la terre: les intellectuels en Israël ( = “The Words and the Earth: Intellectuals in Israel”).

Shockingly, Sand proved that the actual descendants of the ancient Palestinian Jews are the Palestinians of today! When the Romans crushed the two big Jewish revolts in Palestine, the first in AD 66-73 under Nero, Vespasian and Titus, and the second in AD 132 when Hadrian was the emperor, the Roman legions did NOT drive all the Jews out of Palestine, only out of Jerusalem.

Most of the Jews stayed in Palestine, though their temple and capital were gone, and later they became Christians after Constantine the Great began Christianizing the Roman Empire, starting in AD 312.

When the Arab Muslims swept into Palestine in AD 636, these former Jews, now Christians for centuries, began gradually to become muslims over a period of 600 years, often just to avoid persecution, “dhimmi” status and special taxes.  Also, only Muslims were allowed to ride horses or bear arms.

As Wikipedia also informs us, “(the Egyptian ruler Ibrahim Pasha’s conquests (in Palestine in 1834) had a significant demographic change as the region of Palestine had an influx of Muslim tribal immigrants.”

Today these people are “the Palestinians.” But their ancestors WERE the Jews — at the time of Jesus.

This brave Palestinian girl, Ahed Tamimi, was sentenced in March 2018 to eight months in an Israeli jail for slapping an Israeli occupation soldier. Her whole village of Nabi Salih is full of people with blue eyes, even 1,382 years after the semitic Arabs began pouring into Palestine.

As the liberal Israeli Uri Avnery wrote in the Ha’aretz newspaper, Ahed is from a whole village of blue-eyed Palestinians. Below is a 2015 incident, and seems to be the same Ahed taking the lead.

Location of the village of Nabi Saleh where Ahed Tamimi and family live on the West Bank (which once was called Samaria)

Notice the other children also have light hair. The Israeli soldiers are swarthier.

“In this Friday, Aug, 28, 2015 photo, Palestinian women and youth scuffle with an Israeli soldier trying to arrest a 12-year-old boy during a protest near the West Bank village of Nabi Salih. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nabi_Salih  It is a muslim village of 600 near Ramallah. The Tamimi family specifically has suffered terribly under the Israelis and hates them with a justified passion.

 

…..Jesus as depicted in early Christian paintings in Imperial Rome

 

A depiction on the wall of a Christian catacomb under Rome, with the Alpha and Omega letters to either side. Both the apostle Paul (a suspicious character for Hitler and Eckhart) and the (genuine) apostle Peter, who had personally known Jesus for His entire ministry, lived in Rome for years, and were executed there at the instigation of slanderous Jews. Therefore, Jesus’ appearance, and Paul’s, and Peter’s, were known in Rome. 

Jesus with light-brown hair in a catacomb owned by the wealthy Christian breadmaker Bosio. Catacombs were dugout of very soft rock — called ” tufa” — where about six million ancient Romans were buried during the days of the Roman Republic and Empire. Once you dug out a space in this soft, moist rock, the tufa rock was exposed to the air,  dried out, and hardened, making walls and ceilings. 

.

Jesus is depicted with auburn hair in the Church of St. Pudentiana (now Santa Pudenziana) in Rome,  erected around AD 410 on the site of the very first church in Rome, which had been built around AD 150. (Before the Christians began building formal churches, they used to meet in the private homes of well-off believers — who often were women, and very much into a God-is-Love deity. They regularly dined together — adding songs, prayers, a brotherly kiss, a meal, wine and a sermon — so private homes were ideal. Later, as Christianity grew, believers rented meeting halls or rooms,and finally built churches, basilicas and, in the Middle Ages, giant cathedrals.) 

.

Close-up of Jesus

.

I repeat that the Roman congregation was founded by men who actually knew Jesus.

Adolf Hitler painted Mary and Jesus in this way in 1912 in Munich, and always said that anyone who read the words of Jesus could sense that he was an Aryan.

When I was a Jehovah’s Witness, way back in 1970-75, Jesus was always depicted as sort of a handsome Italian with white features and and bone structure, brown hair, and light-brown eyes.

Satan offers Jesus the kingdoms of the world, which are his to give — a reflection of a kind of sordid reality about the world that even (or especially) today remains true.

.

A Pharisee (from the group that later wrote the Gentile-hating Talmud) argues with Jesus over His healing of a blind man on the Sabbath.

.

Jesus resurrecting Lazarus. The Old Testament prophet Elijah (1 Kings 17:17-23) and Elisha (2 Kings 4:8-37)  also resurrected dead men.  The Talmud — written by the grandsons of the Pharisees who actually knew Jesus — absolutely that concedes Jesus was a real person, that He did perform miracles, and that even the using of His name by other healers who were not even Christians could effect a miracle.

.

 

Peter Schafer-Jesus in the Talmud-Princeton University Press (2007)

In fact, one rabbi healed another when dying by pronouncing the name of Jesus. For this both were chastised severely by the elder rabbis, as, according to the Talmud, Jesus was a blasphemer who now is suffering the punishment of a blasphemer down in hell, in fact, boiling in hot feces.  

Note here the fate of Jesus in hell. (Onqelos, who questions the putative Jesus who is imprisoned in Hell, represents  supposedly the man who translated the Hebrew Bible into Aramaic.)

Transcription:

He (Onqelos) went and brought up Jesus the Nazarene (Yeshu hanotzri)/the
sinners of Israel (posh< e Yisrael)11 out of his/their grave(s)
84 Chapter 8
by necromancy and asked him/them: Who is important in that
world?
He/they (Jesus/the sinners of Israel) answered: Israel!
(Onqelos:) What then about joining them?
(Jesus/the sinners of Israel:) Seek their welfare, seek not their
harm. Whoever touches them is as though he touches the apple of
his (God’s) eye!12
(Onqelos:) What is your punishment?
(Jesus/the sinners of Israel:) With boiling excrement

.

……The cross as a Christian symbol came along way, way later

Crucifixion back then was seen as what it really was, a truly horrible thing.

We must recall that the Romans back then were still routinely crucifying 1) thieves, 2) pirates (Julius Caesar was once held by pirates, and threatened them with crucifixion, a threat he later carried out when, later on he had the power in Rome), 3) slaves in open revolt, 4) highwaymen, and 5) murderers — and the Romans continued doing crucifixions centuries.

It could take days to die this way, from exhaustion (it was impossible to breathe without a huge and painful effort), plus there was thirst, sunburn, hunger and exposure to the cold night air. In dry climates, the lack of humidity means the air releases its heat at night. Temperatures can fall from 100 during the day to 40 before dawn.

Crucifixion was one of the main means of execution for really heinous crimes. (Beheading was considered far more merciful, or letting a man open his own veins.)

I have been preparing my very important audiobook and on-line book on what Adolf Hitler and Dietrich Eckart thought of Jesus (which was reverence), and of the Old Testament and Judaism, which was very negative.

UPDATED — SEE COMMENTS BELOW — Honor roll of top donors; Hitler on race and religion with his brilliant mentor, Dietrich Eckart

Their view of the OT was, in fact, extremely negative, and so one could call the two friends, Eckart and Hitler, “extreme Marcionites.” (Bishop Marcion was a Christian bishop who correctly rejected the Old Testament and its harsh tribal god Yahweh, and believed that Jesus came from and worshiped a different and loving God.)

They felt awe of Jesus and saw Him as a radical reformer, preaching another God altogether — a “heavenly father,” as Jesus called Him, hence the Lord’s Prayer, the prayer which Jesus taught his disciples, opens, famously, with this address to God: “Our Father, who art in Heaven.” Jesus’ god is a “God of love,” not the “jealous” deity the Jews had in their Yahweh.

I will never forget an episode of “The Simpsons” cartoon show, which has been running for 29 years now, where one of the characters exclaims about the God of the Jews, that he seems not just jealous but insecure, always wanting constant praise and worship and emphasizing “I, the Lord, am a jealous God” and one who punishes whole generations for the sins of their ancestors.  No loving earthly father would ever talk to his children about how jealous he is and wants praise and adoration the way Yahweh talks to his Old Testament Jews, who, furthermore, drift away from Him constantly for other gods.

Earliest photo of the young activist Hitler, 1920, age 31 (screenshot from an early newsreel), with Bavarian flags.

 

His mentor Eckart was a newspaperman, poet, spiritual thinker and successful playwright and theater producer. One of his plays, his version of Peer Gynt, ran 600 times in Berlin, making him wealthy.

Anyway, Margi suggested I read an excellent monograph in Spanish about Jesus by our friend, the NS and historian Joaquin Bochaca, of Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain,  El mito del judaismo de Cristo, that is, “The Myth of the Jewishness of Jesus”.

Bochaca

 

In it I found already these interesting passages, which I was able to verify elsewhere:

***

“The truth is what they make you believe,” said Voltaire. Today, one of those “truths” is the Jewishness of Christ. “Jesus Christ was a Jew” is a phrase which, if pronounced only a couple of centuries ago, could have cost its author the rigors of the Inquisition.

But in our time this same phrase, by dint of being repeated, in print and orally, millions of times, has become an axiom, a common place, something so undoubted that if it is still repeated often now, it is almost with the sole purpose of serving as a shield or moral bond given to this or that group of Jews to guard against the reaction by us non-Jews against their commercial, political or social methods.

When someone says, for example, that the inventors and the vast majority of the propagators of communism are Jews, or that Jews are the overwhelming majority of the members of the international financial scam, and that they are also – and they were – such or such a pornography dealer, swindler, or a crapulous criminal  such as Ginzberq, Stavisky (JdN: one could add Bernie Madoff today), instead of replying with logical and coherent arguments – as can obviously be done, with greater or lesser success – instead a swarm of pious clerics and kindly laity will tell you unctuously that “our Lord, Jesus Christ, was a Jew, too.”

*** JdN

Jesus was raised in Nazareth in Galilee, in the far north of Palestine.

Galilee has nice, cool mountains,  a huge lake, “the Sea of Galilee” (photo) and many rivers, sort of like Northern California.

Galilee attracted many settlers for many centuries, most of them not Jews, but in fact Whites (Ancient Greeks, Scythians (proto-Slavs?), Macedonians — Northern Greeks — of Alexander the Great, and the Romans).  https://www.haaretz.com/.premium-ancient-roman-legion-base-found-in-megiddo-1.5290705

 

Roman road leading into Syria

A lemon orchard

The Old Testament itself tells how the Jews were wicked, and so God  (Yahweh) let the king of Assyria conquer them, hauling all of them off as permanent troublemakers to Babylon and what is now Iraq.

The Assyrian monarch then settled lots of other people — whom Jews call “Gentiles” — in the lovely land of Galilee.

*** Returning to the Bochaca text:

The Hungarian Ferenc (Bochaca writes “Zajhty” but I believe he means “Szalasi”) claims that “the Jews were sure that Jesus was not of their race. ” (Bochaca refers to a book in Hungarian which would translate as “Millennial Hungary.)

Zajhty asserts that, in the seventh century BC. the Assyrian king Shalmaneser (V) carried away the whole population of Galilee, which even then was only partially Jewish. The Scythian shepherds and the new Greek, Assyrian and Macedonian colonists, who subsequently occupied the space of displaced populations, adopted the Jewish religious creed, but, according to the expression of the Jews themselves, “they were only under Jewish laws” ” The Jews,”  Zajhty avers, “never accepted the Galileans as true descendants of the holy patriarch Abraham.”

During the centuries preceding the birth of Christ, we can confirm the immigration of numerous colonies of Phoenicians and Greeks in Galilee, according to Houston Stewart Chamberlain  (in his Foundations of the Nineteenth Century, p285 in the Spanish version Bochaca used) and especially in Albert Réville ( Jésus de Nazareth, vol. I, p167) who points out that immigration by the semites ( = Phoenicians) exceeded by two to one those of the Aryans (Greeks and Macedonians).

Alexander the Great in 331 a.C. expelled those (same Phoenician) settlers from Samaria,

replacing them with (some of his own) Macedonians; an important part of those Macedonians coming from the District of the Gentiles, Galilee. (Houston Stewart Chamberlain, ibid.,  p289)

It is beyond doubt that in the lands of Galilee, fertile and easily accessible – – unlike Judea, which was practically incommunicado — a multitude of races cohabited, with the exception of what is properly called the Jewish race.

In the Old Testament it is recounted how the Galilean villagers interpreted the multiplication of wild beasts (lions, bears, etc.) in their territory as a sign of the revenge by the gods of the country. They delegated a embassy to the king of the Assyrians, asking them to send them an Israelite priest from those whom he had taken as captives. The priest came and taught the Galileans how to worship the God of Jerusalem.

…..2 Kings chapter 17 Assyrian removes the Jews from Galilee; pagans replace them and out of fear worship Yahweh along with their own gods

.

Hoshea Last King of Israel

17 In the twelfth year of Ahaz king of Judah, Hoshea son of Elah became king of Israel in Samaria, and he reigned nine years. ² He did evil in the eyes of the Lord, but not like the kings of Israel who preceded him.

³ Shalmaneser king of Assyria came up to attack Hoshea, who had been Shalmaneser’s vassal and had paid him tribute. ⁴ But the king of Assyria discovered that Hoshea was a traitor, for he had sent envoys to so (Osorkon?), king of Egypt, and he no longer paid tribute to the king of Assyria, as he had done year by year.

Therefore Shalmaneser seized him and put him in prison. ⁵ The king of Assyria invaded the entire land, marched against Samaria and laid siege to it for three years. ⁶ In the ninth year of Hoshea, the king of Assyria ( now apparently Sargon II; photo right) captured Samaria and deported the Israelites to Assyria. He settled them in Halah, in Gozan on the Habor River and in the towns of the Medes.

Israel Exiled Because of Sin

⁷ All this took place because the Israelites had sinned against Yahweh their God, who had brought them up out of Egypt from under the power of Pharaoh king of Egypt. They worshiped other gods ⁸ and followed the practices of the nations Yahweh had driven out before them, as well as the practices that the kings of Israel had introduced. ⁹ The Israelites secretly did things against Yahweh their God that were not right. From watchtower to fortified city they built themselves high places in all their towns. ¹⁰ They set up sacred stones and Asherah poles on every high hill and under every spreading tree. ¹¹ At every high place they burned incense, as the nations whom Yahweh had driven out before them had done. They did wicked things that aroused Yahweh’s anger. ¹² They worshiped idols, though Yahweh had said, “You shall not do this.”

¹³  Yahweh warned Israel and Judah through all His prophets and seers: “Turn from your evil ways. Observe my commands and decrees, in accordance with the entire Law that I commanded your ancestors to obey and that I delivered to you through my servants the prophets.”

¹⁴ But they would not listen and were as stiff-necked as their ancestors, who did not trust in Yahweh their God. ¹⁵ They rejected his decrees and the covenant he had made with their ancestors and the statutes he had warned them to keep. They followed worthless idols and themselves became worthless. They imitated the nations around them although Yahweh had ordered them, “Do not do as they do.”

¹⁶ They forsook all the commands of Yahweh their God and made for themselves two idols cast in the shape of calves, and an Asherah pole. They bowed down to all the starry hosts, and they worshiped Baal.¹⁷ They sacrificed their sons and daughters in the fire. They practiced divination and sought omens and sold themselves to do evil in the eyes of the Lord, arousing his anger.

¹⁸ So Yahweh was very angry with Israel and removed them from his presence. Only the tribe of Judah was left, ¹⁹ and even Judah did not keep the commands of the Lord their God. They followed the practices Israel had introduced. ²⁰ Therefore Yahweh rejected all the people of Israel; he afflicted them and gave them into the hands of plunderers,until he thrust them from his presence.

²¹ When he tore Israel away from the house of David, they made Jeroboam son of Nebat their king. Jeroboam enticed Israel away from following Yahweh and caused them to commit a great sin. ²² The Israelites persisted in all the sins of Jeroboam and did not turn away from them ²³ until Yahweh removed them from his presence, as He had warned through all his servants the prophets. So the people of Israel (= the northern kingdom, as opposed to Judah, the southern kingdom; see note that follows) were taken from their homeland into exile in Assyria, and they are still there.

*** JdN The word “Samaria” refers to all the “Northern Kingdom” that was ruled from the royal town of Samaria, both what is now called Samaria today (the central section of Israel), and also Galilee in  this far north, as per this standard map of the borders in around 800 BC:

 

Samaria Resettled

²⁴ The king of Assyria brought people from Babylon, Kuthah, Avva, Hamath and Sepharvaim and settled them in the towns of Samaria to replace the Israelites. They took over Samaria and lived in its towns.

²⁵When they first lived there, they did not worship the Lord; so he sent lions among them and they killed some of the people. ²⁶ It was reported to the king of Assyria: “The people you deported and resettled in the towns of Samaria do not know what the god of that country requires. He has sent lions among them, which are killing them off, because the people do not know what he requires.”

²⁷ Then the king of Assyria gave this order: “Have one of the priests you took captive from Samaria go back to live there and teach the people what the god of the land requires.” ²⁸ So one of the priests who had been exiled from Samaria came to live in Bethel and taught them how to worship the Lord.

²⁹ Nevertheless, each national group made its own gods in the several towns where they settled, and set them up in the shrines the people of Samaria had made at the high places. ³⁰ The people from Babylon made Sukkoth Benoth, those from Kuthah made Nergal, and those from Hamath made Ashima; ³¹ the Avvites made Nibhaz and Tartak, and the Sepharvites burned their children in the fire as sacrifices to Adrammelekand Anammelek, the gods of Sepharvaim. ³² 

They worshiped the Lord, but they also appointed all sorts of their own people to officiate for them as priests in the shrines at the high places.

³³ They worshiped Yahweh, but they also served their own gods in accordance with the customs of the nations from which they had been brought. ³⁴ To this day they persist in their former practices. They neither worship Yahweh nor adhere to the decrees and regulations, the laws and commands that Yahweh gave the descendants of Jacob, whom he named Israel. 

³⁵ When Yahweh made a covenant with the Israelites, he commanded them: “Do not worship any other gods or bow down to them, serve them or sacrifice to them. ³⁶ But Yahweh, who brought you up out of Egypt with mighty power and outstretched arm, is the one you must worship. To him you shall bow down and to him offer sacrifices.³⁷ You must always be careful to keep the decrees and regulations, the laws and commands he wrote for you. Do not worship other gods. ³⁸ Do not forget the covenant I have made with you, and do not worship other gods. ³⁹ Rather, worship Yahweh your God; it is he who will deliver you from the hand of all your enemies.”

⁴⁰ They would not listen, however, but persisted in their former practices. ⁴¹ Even while these people were worshiping the Lord, they were serving their idols. To this day their children and grandchildren continue to do as their ancestors did.

*** JdN

The Galileans’ theory, like that of all pagans, was that every place on earth — plains, mountains, rivers, etc.  — had its own god, and that with his people taken away, the god of Galilee, Yahweh, was angry at no longer being worshiped.

So the Gentile Galileans followed His law — without becoming Jews (via drastic things like circumcision, or expensive Temple worship, etc.), thus belonging to a category of Gentiles which the Jews call “the God Fearers.”;-)

The second wife of the mad emperor Nero, Poppaea, was just such a “God Fearer” — a Gentile who prayed to Yahweh, probably did not eat pork, etc. — and she was the monster who incited the emperor Nero (photo) to blame the Great Fire in Rome, which had caused outrage against him, on the innocent Christians, leading to them being burned alive and fed to the lions.

.

This painting below is of a later massacre of Christians, burned alive and crucified at the instigation of slanderous Jews, or fed to the lions.

(The Colosseum, the “Flavian Amphitheater,” had not been built by the time of Nero, but it was running ten years later. The word “flavius,”  by the way, means “blond” in Latin, and is the name of the imperial dynasty that ruled Rome between AD 69 and 96, meaning Vespasian and his two sons, Titus and Domitian.)

The Jews lied to the crowds and the Roman authorities that Christians killed and ate babies, drank blood, had sex with their own siblings, and hated everyone else. They told the pagans that every calamity that befell them was because the Christians did not worship the pagan gods but a black magic practitioner — the evil Jesus, whom Rome had executed. When Christians were to be burned, Jews would run and gather firewood for the fuel. No wonder the Book of Revelation refers to the Jews as “the synagogue of Satan.”

 

*** Back to Bochaca:

This is how the inhabitants of northern Palestine (Samaria and Galilee) became Jews because of religion, even when the Samaritans had very little Jewish blood in their veins, and the Galileans practically none. (Heinrich) Graetz (a very famous Jewish historian of the later 1800s) says that, between the invasions — followed by deportations — of the Assyrians, a small number of Jews had re-infiltrated into Galilee, dedicating themselves to commercial activities and money changing (and NOT to converting the Gentiles).

According to Book of the Maccabees, part one, the Hebrew leader Simon Tharsi gathered all the Jews who had returned to Galilee and forced them all without exception to return to Judea in the year 164 B.C.

Strikingly, Scythians also settled in Galilee and even had their own city, “Scythopolis.” The Scythians were Indo-Europeans from what is now Ukraine, and  fierce warriors, especially as archers on horseback.

They were perhaps early Slavs — or early Aryan Iranians who later became absorbed by the Slavs. (Slavic and Iranian are related Eastern-Aryan languages.)

 

Map showing (encircled in the lower right) the city of Scythopolis

The originality of the Galilean national character is marked by another infallible sign: their language.

In the time of Christ, down in Judea people spoke in Aramaic. The Hebrew language was already back then a dead language, only surviving in the sacred writings (such as the Old Testament and the early Talmud).

The Galileans used another dialect of Aramaic that was so different from that employed by the Jews that even a servant of the High Priest, Caiaphas, during the trial of Jesus, could say to Peter:

“Your accent betrays you as a Galilean.”

The Galileans were even forbidden to pray aloud, since their faulty pronunciation excited hilarity, said the great French author Ernest Renan.

It was apparently almost impossible for Galileans to pronounce some of the sounds of Jewish-Aramaic, which was very guttural. This fact, according to Houston Stewart Chamberlain, denotes a physical difference in the structure of the larynx of the Galileans compared with that of the Jews. One may presume a strong contribution of Aryan blood to the Galileans because of this absence of harsh, guttural sounds.

The guttural “kh-” and “gh-” sounds that are common to all Semitic peoples practically do not exist among the Aryans (except for the Dutch and Afrikaners, and let it be noted that whrn huge numbers of Sephardic Jews left Spain in 1492 when Queen Isabella expelled them, where did they go? To HOLLAND.

https://ask.metafilter.com/108789/How-do-I-pronounce-gutturals-in-Hebrew-and-Arabic

(Humorous video about hyper-guttural semitic sounds)

.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLqYQbOCGJc

It is very true that Arabic and Hebrew have non-stop “hacking” sounds. But the language substrate of the Galileans was not so guttural.

And yes, Greeks were colonizing everywhere around the Mediterranean, and long, long before Alexander. It is possible Greeks were also in the beautiful, cool mountain air of Galilee, though they generally avoided Asia, with its tyrannical governments, for the central and western Mediterranean, but we also know they did setttle in Libya and Egypt.

Greek colonies in blue (and Phoenician in red); 30 different Greek city-states sent out colonists

 

The Ancient Greeks and Trojans were sometimes very nordic.

Ganymede

The head of the Greek gods, Zeus, sent an eagle to abduct Ganymede and take him off to live with the gods and become immortal. His grieving father Thos (lower right) was later compensated with two gorgeous horses from Mount Olympus. Note the yellow paint on the hair of both son and father. (Note also the muscles. The Greeks “worked out” constantly, did bodybuilding, and literally every man was a soldier.)

 

The separation between Jews and Galileans was so pronounced that, according to Father Franz Michel Willam in his (German-language) 1932 work Das Leben Jesu im Lande und Volke Israel ( =The Life of Jesus in the Country and People of Israel), page 146, there was a saying:

“The Galileans value honor more than money;

the Jews money more than honor. “

Willam was a village priest in Vorarlberg, Austria but also an outstanding author. His “Life of Jesus in the Land and among the People of Israel” was published in ten editions in German and was translated into twelve languages. It was his masterpiece, a real bestseller in its day, and it made Willam famous internationally. (He was later a mentor to the priest and scholar Joseph Ratzinger, later Pope Benedict XVI.)

Willam, left and Ratzinger, right

In the original German

The French historian Raoul Patry (PhD in theology in 1899 from the Sorbonne/Paris) recalls that in the time of Jesus, Galilee and Perea had their own autonomous tetrarch, while Judea and Idumea were subject to a Roman procurator.

“The political separation between Jews of race,” says Patry, “and Jews of religion, the former in Judea and the latter in Galilee, was complete.”

Patry notes that the contemporaries of Jesus called him “the Galilean” and “the Nazarene,” and not “the Bethlehemite,” so though he was born in Judea, he was not viewed as a Judean. — Patry, Raoul: La réligion dans l’Allemagne d’aujourd’hui, Paris: Payot, 1926, p165.

Galilee
Jesus came from the town of Nazareth in Galilee. This northern territory of Palestine was also his most important area of activity.

Apart from the larger towns of Sepphoris and Tiberias, Galilee was a country area, and agriculture was the main occupation. The Lake of Gennesaret was famous for its fishing. Jesus is said to have found his first disciples among fishermen (Mark 1:16-29).

In the time of Jesus Galilee was surrounded by a number of Greek cities. There was also in Galilee a group of ten Greek towns – the Decapolis. The rest of the area was Jewish.

Samaria
South of Galilee lived the Samaritans, a mixed population resulting from political transfers of population, whom the Jews did not consider to be real Jews.

While the Jewish Temple was situated on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, the Samaritans regarded Mt. Gerizim as sacred. They recognized as Holy Scripture only the five books of Moses, and the textual form they used was different from that in use among the Jews.

Judaea
The name Judaea had two different senses. Firstly, it meant the area surrounding Jerusalem, secondly it meant the whole area inhabited by Jews, which finally became a Roman province.

The mountainous region surrounding Jerusalem is dry and bare. To the east is the Dead Sea. In the oasis area north of the Dead Sea is Jericho, which is thought to be one of the oldest towns in the world.

Jerusalem

To the Jews Jerusalem was the centre of the world, where God dwelt in the Temple. The Jews went there on pilgrimage at least once a year. It was also the economic, administrative and cultural centre. The Roman administration of Palestine was directed from Caesarea.

The Herodian Dynasty

At the time of the birth of Jesus Palestine was ruled by the Roman vassal king Herod the Great, who was renowned for his great building projects and for his arbirtrary actions and ruthlessness, which towards the end of his rule became sheer paranoia.

After the death of Herod his dominion was divided into three parts among his sons, who continued as Roman vassals.

Archelaus was given control of Judaea and the region of Perea east of the Jordan. He was, however, a bad king. In 6 A.D. the complaints of his subjects led to his being exiled by the Emperor to Gaul. At the same time Judaea, Samaria and Idumaea were united to form the province of Judaea, whose administrator was – under the imperial legate of Syria – a representative of Rome, at first a prefect, later a procurator.

Galilee was ruled by Archelaus’ brother Antipas. His actions, too, caused bad blood among his subjects. For instance, John the Baptist criticized Antipas, who eventually had him executed (see Mark 6:14-29). As a result of political intrigue Antipas too was exiled to Gaul in 39 A.D.

The only one of Herod the Great’s sons to be a successful ruler was Philip, who ruled from Galilee the regions of Trachonitis, Gaulanitis, Batanaea and Auranitis to the south-east.

Pilate

During the period 26-36 the Roman representative in Judaea was Pontius Pilate, who failed to understand the religious feelings of the Jews. This led to repeated conflicts and protests, and in suppressing them Pilate showed cruelty and a tendency to use strong measures. Pilate’s career was finally interrupted as a result of complaints made to the Emperor by his subjects.

The Jewish War

After the rule of Pilate the situation in Palestine became more and more tense and finally came to a head in the revolt of 66 A.D.

At first the rebels achieved success. The battle against the technical and material supremacy of Rome was, however, hopeless from the very beginning. Jerusalem was conquered in the year 70, and itsTemple was destroyed. The last pocket of resistance was the mountain fortress of Masada. It was conquered in 73 A.D.

Hellenistic Culture in Palestine

(Summary; original © Pauli Huuhtanen and Nils Martola / Kirjapaja 1997.)

By Hellenism is meant the interaction between Greek culture and the cultures of the Near East as a result of the conquests of Alexander the Great.

Palestine was one of the areas settled by people of Greek origin. The newcomers settled in the Phoenician cities of the Mediterranean coast and founded new Greek cities inland, whose administration, economy, legal system and official cult were based on the Greek model.

The Hellenization of Palestine was reinforced by the rule of pro-Greek kings from the 3rd century B.C. onwards and later by the Roman administration. The dynasty of Herod, who had ruled as a Roman vassal, admired Greek culture and adopted Greek manners. The ruling Jewish elite was open to Hellenism.

.

.

…..Reaction of a reader

I have always felt the same about Jesus. But how do you explain the genealogies of Jesus which kick off two of the Gospels, claiming that His ancestry went back to the legendary King David, given your perspective of Jesus-the-Gentile?

I replied:

The one by Matthew, chapter 1, runs from Abraham down to Joseph, which is genetically irrelevant because Joseph was only Jesus’ stepfather.

The New Testament clearly proclaims as its principal dogma that God Himself was Jesus’ “biological” and real father.

*** Matthew 1:1-24

1 This is the genealogy of Jesus the Messiah the son of David, the son of Abraham:

² Abraham was the father of Isaac, Isaac the father of Jacob, Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers,

³ Judah the father of Perez and Zerah, whose mother was Tamar, Perez the father of Hezron, Hezron the father of Ram,

⁴ Ram the father of Amminadab, Amminadab the father of Nahshon, Nahshon the father of Salmon,

⁵ Salmon the father of Boaz, whose mother was Rahab, Boaz the father of Obed, whose mother was Ruth, Obed the father of Jesse,

⁶ and Jesse the father of King David.

 

David was the father of Solomon, whose mother had been Uriah’s wife,

 ⁷ Solomon the father of Rehoboam, Rehoboam the father of Abijah, Abijah the father of Asa,

⁸ Asa the father of Jehoshaphat, Jehoshaphat the father of Jehoram, Jehoram the father of Uzziah,

⁹ Uzziah the father of Jotham, Jotham the father of Ahaz, Ahaz the father of Hezekiah,

¹⁰ Hezekiah the father of Manasseh, Manasseh the father of Amon, Amon the father of Josiah,

¹¹ and Josiah the father of Jeconiah and his brothers at the time of the exile to Babylon.

¹² After the exile to Babylon:

Jeconiah was the father of Shealtiel, Shealtiel the father of Zerubbabel, 

¹³ Zerubbabel the father of Abihud, Abihud the father of Eliakim, Eliakim the father of Azor,

¹⁴ Azor the father of Zadok, Zadok the father of Akim, Akim the father of Elihud,

¹⁵ Elihud the father of Eleazar, Eleazar the father of Matthan, Matthan the father of Jacob,

¹⁶ and Jacob the father of Joseph, the husband of Mary, and Mary was the mother of Jesus who is called the Messiah.

¹⁷ Thus there were fourteen generations in all from Abraham to David, fourteen from David to the exile to Babylon, and fourteen from the exile to the Messiah. (JdN: cute….)

Joseph Accepts Jesus as His Son

¹⁸ This is how the birth of Jesus the Messiah came about: His mother Mary was pledged to be married to Joseph, but before they came together, she was found to be pregnant through the Holy Spirit.¹⁹ Because Joseph her husband was faithful to the law, and yet did not want to expose her to public disgrace, he had in mind to divorce her quietly.

²⁰ But after he had considered this, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said,

“Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary home as your wife, because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. ²¹ She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name ‘Jesus,’ because he will save his people from their sins.”

(“Jesus” (a Greek version of His name) means in Hebrew “Yehoshu,” that is, “Yahweh Saves.” Talmudic Jews call Him “Yeshu”.)

Yeshu is depicted as a whining monkey, and is mocked and crucified by a Jewish girl in a bikini in a 2006 Israel tv comedy: .https://johndenugent.com/images/Israeli-comedy-mocks-crucifies-Jesus-monkey.mp4

 

²² All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had said through the prophet: ²³ “The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel” (which means “God with us”).

²⁴ When Joseph woke up, he did what the angel of the Lord had commanded him and took Mary home as his wife. ²⁵ But he did not consummate their marriage until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name ‘Jesus.’”

***

The genealogy in Luke 3:21-29 also deals with Joseph (who, again, is NOT the biological father), but actually seems to refer to the ancestors of Mary. (See below the text in Luke.)

The genealogical line running from David to Joseph in Luke is actually very different from that in Matthew!

This is a really murky and dubious story, and one of many pious legends in the Bible.

(It reminds me of the “Greatest Generation” nonsense that today glorifies the generation of gullible sheep who, incredibly, four times elected an arch-criminal, liar and failure, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, to the US presidency and how FDR’s soldier-saints then “saved the world for freedom and stopped the Nazis.” It is really a national ego trip about how great grandpa was — and by extension his grandchildren…. so very “proud to be an American, because at least I know I’m free” — free to watch different television channels, to choose between French-vanilla and regular-vanilla ice cream, or select which disgraceful political puppet of Jewry will get their meaningless vote.)

As Wikipedia accurately states (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genealogy_of_Jesus):

The New Testament provides two accounts of the genealogy of Jesus, one in the Gospel of Matthew and another in the Gospel of Luke. Matthew’s starts with Abraham, while Luke begins with Adam. The lists are identical between Abraham and David, but differ radically from that point. Traditional Christian scholars (starting with the historian Eusebius⁽¹⁾) have put forward various theories that seek to explain why the lineages are so different,⁽²⁾ such as that Matthew’s account follows the lineage of Joseph, while Luke’s follows the lineage of Mary. Some modern critical scholars like Marcus Borg and John Dominic Crossan claim both genealogies as inventions, to bring the Messianic claims into conformity with Jewish criteria.⁽³⁾ 

^(….) Modern scholarship tends to see the genealogies of Jesus as theological constructs ( =pious lies) rather than factual history:

family pedigrees would not usually have been available for non-priestly families, ( = only priests knew their real ancestry, not average people claiming they descended from King David)

and the contradictions between the two lists are seen as clear evidence that these were not based on genealogical records.

Additionally, the use of titles such as ‘Son of God’ and ‘Son of David’ are seen as evidence that they do not come from the earliest Gospel traditions.⁽²⁷⁾ Raymond E. Brown says the genealogies “tell us nothing certain about his grandparents or his great-grand-parents”.⁽²⁸⁾

Gundry suggests the series of unknown names in Matthew connecting Joseph’s grandfather to Zerubbabel as an outright fabrication, produced by collecting and then modifying various names from 1 Chronicles.⁽²⁹⁾ Sivertsen sees Luke’s as artificially pieced together out of oral traditions.

The pre-exilic series Levi, Simeon, Judah, Joseph consists of the names of tribal patriarchs, far more common after the Exile (to Babylon) than before, while the name Mattathias and its variants begin at least three suspiciously similar segments.⁽³⁰⁾ Kuhn likewise suggests that the two series Jesus–Mattathias (77–63) and Jesus–Mattatha (49–37) are duplicates.⁽³¹⁾

The contradictions between the lists have been used to question the accuracy of the Gospel accounts since ancient times,⁽³²⁾ and several early Christian authors responded to this. Augustine, for example, attempted on several occasions to refute every criticism, not only because the Manichaeans in his day were using the differences to attack Christianity,⁽³³⁾ but also because he himself (Augustine!) had seen them in his youth as cause for doubting the veracity of the Gospels.⁽³⁴⁾

(…) Three consecutive kings of Judah are omitted (from Matthew): Ahaziah, Jehoash, and Amaziah. These three kings are seen as especially wicked, from the cursed line of Ahab through his daughter Athaliah to the third and fourth generation.⁽⁷⁾ The author could (also) have omitted them to create a second set of fourteen.⁽⁸⁾

*** Luke 3:21-29

²¹ When all the people were being baptized, Jesus was baptized too. And as he was praying, heaven was opened ²² and the Holy Spirit descended on him in bodily form like a dove. And a voice came from heaven: “You are my Son, whom I love; with you I am well pleased.”

²³ Now Jesus himself was about thirty years old when he began his ministry. He was the son, so it was thought, of Joseph,

the son of Heli, 

²⁴ the son of Matthat, the son of Levi, the son of Melki, the son of Jannai, the son of Joseph,

²⁵ the son of Mattathias, the son of Amos, the son of Nahum, the son of Esli, the son of Naggai, 

²⁶ the son of Maath, the son of Mattathias, the son of Semein, the son of Josek, the son of Joda,

²⁷ the son of Joanan, the son of Rhesa, the son of Zerubbabel, the son of Shealtiel, the son of Neri, 

²⁸ the son of Melki, the son of Addi, the son of Cosam, the son of Elmadam, the son of Er,

²⁹ the son of Joshua, the son of Eliezer,  the son of Jorim, the son of Matthat, the son of Levi, 

³⁰ the son of Simeon, the son of Judah, the son of Joseph, the son of Jonam, the son of Eliakim,

³¹ the son of Melea, the son of Menna, the son of Mattatha, the son of Nathan, the son of David, 

³² the son of Jesse, the son of Obed, the son of Boaz, the son of Salmon, the son of Nahshon,

³³ the son of Amminadab, the son of Ram,the son of Hezron, the son of Perez, the son of Judah, 

³⁴ the son of Jacob, the son of Isaac, the son of Abraham, the son of Terah, the son of Nahor,

³⁵ the son of Serug, the son of Reu, the son of Peleg, the son of Eber, the son of Shelah,

 ³⁶ the son of Cainan, the son of Arphaxad, the son of Shem, the son of Noah, the son of Lamech,

³⁷ the son of Methuselah, the son of Enoch, the son of Jared, the son of Mahalalel, the son of Kenan, 

³⁸ the son of Enosh, the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God.

***

One can question how much of the Old Testament is historically true, or the stories about King David. Even many Israeli historians concede that most of the stories are myths. Many historians think that Jerusalem under David – if he ever existed — was a village of a thousand residents. This photo shows the foundations of his tiny supposed “royal palace.” http://www.newsweek.com/bible-david-solomon-timna-copper-mines-archaeology-717192

Compare these primitive rock walls with the magnificent architecture of Egypt or Babylon at the same time!

The Great Library of Babylon. (When the Jews were exiled in 740 BC to this great capital full of Gentiles, very few of them returned in 539 BC to their original Palestine, once the Persian king Cyrus the Great had conquered Babylonia and released them.)

So who really knows if David was real or who his descendants were?

RationalWiki says (https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/King_David):

King David was the second king of Israel and Judah, and most famous for killing Goliath, although he wasn’t king when he did that. David was a bit of a jerk, paying for one of his wives in Philistine foreskins,(1) sending some dude (Uriah) to be killed so he could bang his wife, and the most heinous of crimes: conducting a census at the behest of Satan.(2) Or maybe not.(3)

Jesus is supposedly descended from David, though there is the problem of being the “Son of God” as it is Joseph who was the descendant of David, and if He were conceived immaculately, then he wasn’t the son of Joseph and therefore he WASN’T a descendant of David.

Was (David) real?

The source for everything we know about David is the Bible. There are a few possible extra-biblical sources, such as the Tel Dan Stele. This Aramean victory stele contains the phrase ביתדוד which translates to “House of the beloved”, “House of the uncle” or “House of David”. (4) As the stele describes a victory over Israel and an unspecified allied kingdom it isn’t unreasonable to suppose they refer to Judah and its David. However, the “city of David” section of Jerusalem lacks convincing evidence of being any kind of “city” in circa 1000 BCE, though the ruins are difficult to date accurately. (5)

Most scholars hold the position that the Histories (Nevi’im) describe real people, in a fictionalized account. Therefore, it’s likely King David existed, and he was for Judah their most powerful or important king. But since no one else mentions him, he probably was not a major player in the greater Middle East region of the time. (6)

 

References

1.  He was only required to bring 100 foreskins, but he gathered 200, because you can never have enough foreskins. The whole thing was a plot by Saul to kill David, though, so he gets a pass here
2. ↑ 1 Chronicles 21:1
3. ↑ 2 Samuel 24:1
4. ↑ Mykytiuk, Lawrence J. (2004). “Identifying Biblical Persons in Northwest Semitic Inscriptions of 1200-539 B.C.E.” Atlanta, Ga.: Society of Biblical Literature. See pp. 110-132 and 265-277
5. ↑ “Solomon’s Jerusalem: The Text and the Facts on the Ground,” in: A.G. Vaughn and A.E. Killebrew (eds.), Jerusalem in Bible and Archaeology: The First Temple Period, (Society of Biblical Literature, Symposium Series, No. 18), Atlanta, 2003, pp. 103-115. See also Cahill, J., “David’s Jerusalem, Fiction or Reality? The Archaeological Evidence Proves It,” and Steiner, M., “David’s Jerusalem, Fiction or Reality? It’s Not There: Archeology Proves a Negative,” both in Biblical Archeology Review 24 (July/August 1998).
6. ↑ Archeology Magazine

.

***JdN  — final comment

With every truly major ruler, 1) other kings mention them in correspondence or show them in war statuary (if they beat them or take some of their soldiers prisoner), and 2) we also find coins, inscriptions or statues with their likeness on them.

With King David or his son, King Solomon — there is nothing, zip, nada, nichts.

These two Jewish kings may be just as real as the Jews’ Holocaust, or their glorifications of the great Jews geniuses Sigmund Freud and Albert Einstein — 95% of it is just Jewish fake news.

And it is the same with Jesus. As a Galilean, he may have been 5% Jewish, or maybe not Jewish at all in His DNA.

(Many of us have a smidgen of Jewish blood in us because for thousands of years young Jews, disgusted with Judaism’s lies, greed and hatred, have left Judaism, married Gentiles, and joyfully become part of the Gentile world. Were Jewry not a path to greater wealth and power, very may Jews would turn their back on this horrific faith.)

What really counts, as we saw also with Adolf Hitler, who was striking but neither ugly nor handsome,

is not how the man appeared, but what he preached to the world and did.

Both denounced Judaism and the Jews, and proclaimed that a new world must come that is free of ego, hate, lies, and greed — either that, or humanity will destroy itself.

.

“The Galileans value honor more than money;

the Jews money more than honor. “

 

I agree with most of what Dr. Lasha Darkmoon wrote here in defense of all that is good in Christianity: https://www.darkmoon.me/2018/the-plot-against-christ/

If the Jews invented Christianity as a cunning ploy to weaken Christians and turn them into natural-born slaves, which is what the Christ-bashing conspiracy theorists maintain, then you need to explain why the Jews have spent so much of their time and energy, ever since the foundation of Christianity, trying to destroy the very thing they should never have created in the first place.

Why create a Frankenstein monster in Palestine 2000 years ago (.…) in order to spend the next 2,000 years trying to destroy it? 

I have to heartily concur after reading (actually twice) this superb book in French, Jewish Antichristianism, by Martin Peltier. The Jews hated Jesus and His religion from Day One, from the get-go, and for 2,000 years straight have led or funded every single movement against Christianity, debunking, persecuting undermining, weakening and dividing it.

But saying that does not mean I approve of all the established “Christian” dogmas as laid down 300 years later by various church councils under the supervision of brutal Roman and/or Byzantine emperors.

After 1) the peril emanating from the US Federal Reserve (which means Jewish control of our money) and then 2) the Jewish control of the media, the third-most dangerous thing on earth in my eyes is the notion that “Jesus-was-a-Jew” and the suicidally pro-Jewish, pro-Yahweh, pro-Old Testament affections for Israel and Jewry of many white Christians.

UPDATED Jesus depicted as an Aryan by early Christians; NS writer Bochaca says Jesus was not physically Jewish — His native Galilee was “the District of the Gentiles”

Christian-Zionist pastor John Hagee

The most pernicious garbage is what was propounded by “Saint” Paul (the Sanhedrin agent Saul) in the Book of Romans about how the Jews were “still” God’s Chosen People (as if they ever were!)

But Jesus, the real Christian authority, said the Jews were becoming SATAN’s people (John 8:44) and that God would reject the Jews if they rejected and killed His Son!

The Parable of the Tenants

³³ “Listen to another parable: There was a landowner who planted a vineyard. He put a wall around it, dug a winepress in it and built a watchtower. Then he rented the vineyard to some farmers and moved to another place. ³⁴ When the harvest time approached, he sent his servants to the tenants to collect his fruit.

³⁵ “The tenants seized his servants; they beat one, killed another, and stoned a third. ³⁶ Then he sent other servants to them, more than the first time, and the tenants treated them the same way. ³⁷ Last of all, he sent his son to them. ‘They will respect my son,’ he said.

³⁸ “But when the tenants saw the son, they said to each other, ‘This is the heir. Come, let’s kill him and take his inheritance.’ ³⁹ So they took him and threw him out of the vineyard and killed him.

⁴⁰ “Therefore, when the owner of the vineyard comes, what will he do to those tenants?”

⁴¹ “He will bring those wretches to a wretched end,” they replied, “and he will rent the vineyard to other tenants, who will give him his share of the crop at harvest time.”

⁴² Jesus said to them, “Have you never read in the Scriptures:

“‘The stone the builders rejected
    has become the cornerstone;
the Lord has done this,
    and it is marvelous in our eyes’?

⁴³ “Therefore I tell you that the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people who will produce its fruit.

⁴⁴ Anyone who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces; anyone on whom it falls will be crushed.”

⁴⁵ When the chief priests and the Pharisees heard Jesus’ parables, they knew he was talking about them. ⁴⁶ They looked for a way to arrest him, but they were afraid of the crowd because the people held that he was a prophet.

***

But Paul, who elbows his way into Christianity and pushes aside the apostles who actually knew the man, contradicts “this Jesus guy” (“what does He know anyway?”) in his letter to the Romans, chapter 11

1I ask then: Did God reject his people? By no means! I am an Israelite myself, a descendant of Abraham, from the tribe of Benjamin. (…)

25I do not want you to be ignorant of this mystery, brothers and sisters, so that you may not be conceited: Israel has experienced a hardening in part until the full number of the Gentiles has come in, 26and in this way

As it is written:

“The deliverer will come from Zion;

he will turn godlessness away from Jacob.

27And this is my covenant with them

when I take away their sins.”

28As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies for your sake; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs, 29for God’s gifts and his call are irrevocable.

(Well, shucks, folks, this is sort- of the exact opposite of what Jesus said!

This is just Sanhedrin undercover agent Saul/Paul desperately peddling to Christians, who have every reason to hate the Jews for 1) murdering Christ and 2) attacking them as well, “Now, now, don’t become antisemitic! We Jews are STILL the Chosen People, goyim!“)

30Just as you who were at one time disobedient to God have now received mercy as a result of their disobedience, 31so they too have now become disobedient in order that they too may now receive mercy as a result of God’s mercy to you.

(This is the ultimate in corkscrew b-s logic. So God made the Jews be wicked…. so He could show mercy to Gentiles?

Umm, how about instead God just being merciful to the Gentiles anyway, regardless of what the Jews choose to do?

32For God has bound everyone over to disobedience so that he may have mercy on them all.

(Hunh? This reminds me of what one Church Father said: “Credo quia absurdum” = “I believe because it is absurd.”

And look — the entire premise that God ever loved or chose the horrible Jews anyway is a vast, bogus, absurd, megalomaniac false premise, a Jew ego trip and fantasy!

The Jews, originally called “the Hebrews,” descend not from some God-fearing old patriarch, but from a roaming horde of robbers, thieves, prostitutes, fences, mercenaries and hitmen called “the Habiru”!

And since when is a man agreeing to human-sacrifice his own son, as Abraham was willing to do to get Yahweh’s blessing, somehow not a twisted, depraved and criminal mindset, and one which only a demon god would request and reward?

Jewish scholar Ariel Toaff was right — the first Hebrew, Abraham himself, was already willing to commit ritual murder! OF HIS OWN SON!

The Hebrews of the Bible  (called Habirus by the Ancient Egyptians and Hittites) were roaming criminal hordes  of semitic neo-neanderthals, who for their criminal traits were selected by the demonic alien Yahweh to be “his people” and rule the world — if they obeyed his plan. When Abraham agreed to human-sacrifice his own son Isaac to get the rewards Yahweh promised, that proved he had the “right stuff.”

I will be addressing all this soon in my audio and online book using the chapbook by Dietrich Eckart and Adolf Hitler, who in 1923 worked up a fascinating discussion into “Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin.”  

Anyway, I did some more research into how Jesus and others were depicted in the catacombs in Rome. Let us recall over and over and over that a number of the founders of the church in Rome had actually KNOWN Jesus in Palestine (Galilee, Samaria and Judea), including and especially Peter himself. (Peter was crucified in Rome at the behest of the Jews under Emperor Nero, whose wife Poppea was a strong judeophile.)

This is how the early Christians remembered Paul, who was also in Rome, as very jewy.

This is how they saw Jesus and Mary:

Close-up of the boy Jesus

 Traversing the sky in a chariot, Jesus, the blond risen Lord, has sunbeams emerging from his head  

 

Close-up of “the Lord”

.

.

.

Albert Réville (Jésus de Nazareth, 1923):

The dogma of redemption by the suffering and death of Christ is the mythical representation of the fact, which is proved by experience and illustrated by the greatest martyrs, that the progress and freedom of humanity are attained at the cost of acute suffering that is undergone by all benefactors. . . .

The dogma of original sin sums up in the persons of the first ancestors of our race, persons who are more mythical than real, what happens over and over again each time that a man is born into the world.

…..Jesus introduced addressing God as “Our Father”

Jesus was the son of God, not the son of a Jew. The two major historians Heinrich Grätz and Robertson Smith agree that, in addition to Assyrians and Greeks, tribes of Scythian shepherds settled there (an Iranian or even proto-Slavic tribe).

 

Luke 2:52 And Jesus advanced in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and men.

John 18:36 Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world:

John 19:12 However, the Jewish leaders cried out, saying, “If you release this man, you aren’t a friend of the emperor! Anyone who makes himself out to be a king opposes the emperor!”

My goal is a new Aryan religion that puts Jesus in our Pantheon of heroes, but does not let Him, as a Jew, even a very good one, dominate our consciousness any longer, though the churches in His honor dominate our cities and towns, they have for 1600 years, Christmas is a huge and beloved celebration, Christian art and music ditto, and women love the idea that “God is love.”

I interpret Jesus as Hitler and Eckart did, as a man determined to radically reform Judaism and turn it into a religion of peace and love, not vengeance, conquest, greed, and hate, so that the Jews would stop plotting to enslave and genocide mankind. Of course he failed, and then Paul took a message meant only for Jews, in order to defang them, and put it out in a pro-Jewish form to the Gentiles, where it now makes us into wimps who revere our enemy, Jewry.

Adolf Hitler is one of the most famous persons who ever lived. And if the human race avoids a third and final world war, an all-out war between Russia and America, and if it survives at all on this planet, then Hitler likely will be remembered for centuries or millennia to come alongside such figures as Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar, Genghis Khan and Napoleon as a powerful, charismatic leader and conqueror who changed human history.

Few know that Alexander the Great actually had a tutor when he was young, the great Greek philosopher Aristotle.

As Wikipedia correctly states:

 Along with Plato, Aristotle is considered the “Father of Western Philosophy”, which from his teachings inherited almost its entire lexicon, including problems and methods of inquiry, so influencing almost any form of knowledge known to the modern world. His writings cover many subjects “ including physics, biology, zoology, metaphysics, logic, ethics, aesthetics, poetry, theater, music, rhetoric, psychology, linguistics, politics and government  “ and constitute the first comprehensive system of Western philosophy. Shortly after (his teacher) Plato died, Aristotle left Athens and, at the request of (King) Philip II of Macedon, tutored (his son), Alexander the Great, beginning in 343 BC. Aristotle was appointed as the head of the royal academy of Macedon.

During that time he gave lessons not only to Alexander, but also to two other future kings: Ptolemy and Cassander.

Aristotle encouraged Alexander toward eastern conquest and his attitude towards Persia was unabashedly ethnocentric. In one famous example, he counsels Alexander to be “a leader to the Greeks and a despot to the barbarians, to look after the former as after friends and relatives, and to deal with the latter as with beasts or plants”.

We all know that Alexander did go on to defeat and destroy the gigantic Persian Empire which had repeatedly invaded Greece, and create a new empire which spread the Greek language and culture to many countries.

Well, when he was a youngish adult, from age 30 to 33, Adolf Hitler also had a tutor, but also a caring mentor, and a very close friend whose advice he followed.

That friend’s name was Dietrich Eckart.

It is clear to me that Dietrich Eckart ” an artist who realized the necessity of a new leader, a new genius, entering German politics in order to obtain power ”  was the decisive influence on the young former soldier Adolf Hitler.

He transformed him from the introvert he had been, a quiet poet, thinker, reader and painter before World War One, into the dynamic and spectacular politician of the masses which he became, into a fascinating orator, into the creator of such pageantry as the Nuremberg Rallies, into the designer of magnificent Wehrmacht and SS military uniforms, and finally into the head of state of a major power, the German Reich, which rose to became a conquering world superpower, and it took the whole Jewish-controlled world six years of total war to defeat one country.

It was Dietrich Eckart who enriched Hitler’s understanding both of the higher spiritual realities, and got him to also believe in himself and in his destiny. And based on his vast experience in the theater world, Eckart showed Hitler how to fascinate the masses and make them love and follow him.

In terms of world history, Dietrich Eckart deserves the fullest credit for transforming Adolf Hitler from a quiet, shy watercolor painter, avid reader, and amateur poet into the great Führer and world leader that he later became. Of course, these abilities already were slumbering in Hitler, but as so often, it is the right mentor who brings them out, and his praise, advice and encouragement of Hitler made him a star.

Dietrich Eckart, born 23 March 1868, died 26 December 1923 was a German journalist, playwright, poet, and politician who was one of the founders of the Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (German Workers’ Party – DAP), which under Hitler evolved into the National Socialist German Workers Party, the NSDAP. Eckart was a key influence on Adolf Hitler in the early years of the NS Party and was a participant in the 1923 Beer Hall Putsch.

He died shortly after the betrayed and failed putsch, and was honored during the Third Reich, which began nine years after his death, as a major thinker and writer.

In 1912 the playwright Eckart adapted the famous Norwegian play “Peer Gynt”  for the German stage. It is a five-act play in verse by the Norwegian dramatist Henrik Ibsen, first published in 1867. Eckart translated and dramatized the play for the German audience. It became in his hands “a powerful dramatisation of nationalist and anti-semitic ideas”, in which Gynt represents the superior Germanic hero, struggling against implicitly Jewish “trolls”.

Ralph M. Engelman, a Jewish professor who wrote a 1979 book on Eckart, said, “Eckart meant his adaptation of ‘Peer Gynt’ to represent a racial allegory in which the trolls and the Great Boyg, (NN: a giant, slimy serpent in Norwegan folklore, a hindrance to travellers, whose name means ‘bent’, ‘twisted’ or ‘curved’) (thbese trolls and the Great Boyg) represented what (Otto) Weininger (who was a Jew who turned radically against Judaism as a young man, and, despairing, committed suicide) conceived to be the Jewish spirit.”⁽³⁷⁾

 ^{Eckart’s version was one of the best attended productions of the age with more than 600 performances in Berlin alone.}

Eckart later helped to found the National Socialist party.

This success –a run of 600 performances was enormous — not only made Eckart wealthy, it gave him the social contacts that he later used to introduce Hitler to dozens of important German citizens. These introductions proved to be pivotal in Hitler’s ultimate rise to power. Later on, Eckart developed an ideology of a “genius superman.” He also became fascinated by the Buddhist doctrine of Maya (illusion).

Maya is everything that makes the real appear unreal and the unreal appear real. Maya is that which obscures, confuses and distracts an individual.

***

But this public identification with Roman Catholicism was largely for political reasons, given that the two were seeking to grow a new political movement in Bavaria, which is, or certainly then was, an arch-Catholic region that is located in the southeastern part of Germany running up to the northern edge of the Alps and the plains of the Danube River. One could even call Bavaria, and neighboring Austria, which is next-door, and where Hitler grew up, and where the dialect and psychology are very similar, as the German Bible Belt. I lived there in 1975-76, married an Austrian woman, I converted there myself to Catholicism — partly to please her parents — I visited Austria many times after returning to America, and I raised two German-speaking children with her. As Austro-Bavarians who were eager to appeal to the masses, Hitler and Eckart would certainly pay at least lip service to the Catholic Church.

Hitler wanted a rebirth of this nation after their bloody defeat in World War One, with two million killed and four million wounded. Then had come the communist uprisings all over Germany. Then came the Great Inflation of the early 1920s that wiped out the middle class. In the late Twenties the Great Depression came over from Wall Street to Germany, throwing one in three German workers onto the breadlines. Just as terrifying was the rise of the gigantic communist Soviet Union literally next door to Germany,and of its puppet in Germany, the German Communist Party, which in 1932 became the second-biggest party in Germany after the NSDAP itself.

“The elements of which our body is made belong to the cycle of nature; and as for our soul, it’s possible that it might return to limbo, until it gets an opportunity to REINCARNATE itself.”

Hitler only said “it is possible” because it was during a light conversation, not a church setting, or a class, or a speech, and he certainly was not about to preach a sermon like some priest, minister or guru to the crusty Wehrmacht generals and their wives who were present and while everyone was just relaxing.

After all, his goal was always to unite and, if possible, never divide, so he just put the thought out there and left it at that. He did not want his generals to think he was a “kook” for believing in reincarnation, so he left it vague. In that way, no one was disturbed, bothered, alienated and offended.

Hitler’s chief philosopher, the German Arthur Schopenhauer, based all his ideas on reincarnation and a kind of western buddhism. When off-duty in WWI, Hitler read Schopenhauer in the trenches. Death, that is, being killed, was, of course, a daily fact of life for infantry corporal Adolf Hitler during his four years of wartime service, where he earned two Iron Crosses for bravery.

And he had many opportunities to think about death.  As Wikipedia correctly says:

During the war, Hitler served in France and Belgium in the 16th Bavarian Reserve Regiment. He was an infantryman in the 1st Company during the First Battle of Ypres (October 1914), which Germans remember as the Kindermord bei Ypern (“The Murder of the Children at Ypres”) because approximately 40,000 men (between a third and a half) of nine newly-enlisted infantry divisions became casualties in 20 days.

Hitler’s regiment entered the battle with 3,600 men and at its end mustered 611. (In other words, 5/6ths of his regiment was killed or wounded.)

The regimental commander (Julius List) himself was killed and thereafter they became known as the List Regiment in his honor. By December Hitler’s own company of 250 was reduced to 42. (That means over 4/5ths were killed or wounded.)

Hitler actually had other controversial views which he did not broadcast to the general public, but expressed them in these conversations at the Führer headquarters, such as a belief that we earthly humans are probably not the only intelligent life forms in the universe.

Also from the book Table Talk, we read Hitler saying, as summarized in a formal style by Colonel Picker:

(stars, that is, planets, or heavenly bodies, are not always sources of light)

 

As for the doctrine of rebirth, of possibly having more than one life, this seemingly exotic and Eastern idea that we think comes only from Hinduism and Buddhism, actually does not. Many westerners believed in it before the advent of Pauline Christianity.

But yes, Hinduism and Buddhism, gigantic world religions that are thousands of years old and have hundreds of millions of adherents, and hundreds of thousands of temples, priests, monks and nuns, these major world religions which have guided India, China and Japan for millennia, are based on reincarnation.

And both these major faiths were founded by ancient white people, by Aryans who had moved east from Europe into Asia, invading India, whites called “the Aryans.” Then Hinduism and Buddhism spread from India into the EastAsian areas via white missionaries, and they became the main religions of China, Japan, Korea, Cambodia, Vietnam, Thailand, etc.

In fact, the caste system which the Aryans set up over the conquered, dark-skinned Indian natives was called “varna,”which means literally “skin color,” with the whites at the top of society as the kings, army officers and the priests.

So reincarnation, this supposedly Indian idea, is really a profoundly white, Aryan doctrine that whites brought to India, and then it was spread by other whites to China, Japan, Korea, etc.

As for the Buddha, whose real name was Prince Gautama Siddhartha, he was, as he is depicted often across Asia, a white Aryan aristocrat with blue eyes.

And to show further how un-exotic reincarnation is, it was embraced and proclaimed by the great American industrialist and automobile maker, Henry Ford, founder of the world-famous Ford Motor Company, which is today a $150 billion-a-year company.

Henry Ford was also a man whom Hitler revered for raising wages for the working class, maing the affordable Model-T car for the masses, and for publicly exposing the evil rule of Jewry over the West.

Did you know that Adolf Hitler had a bust of Henry Ford in his office in Munich, at the party headquarters, called the Brown House? ”

Well, this great car maker, author, peace activist and public figure, Henry Ford, said:

.

.

In the reincarnation view of life, and of why we are in the world, everyone is incarnated to grow through relationships, pain and challenges.

Then the time comes for everyone, even the greatest or most famous, to die ” die so they can pass into another world, and there be shown a powerful 3-D video, a life-review video, after their death.

They can honestly face their own errors, flaws and failures as well as rejoice in their good points, their good deeds, and admirable achievements.

Then afterward, after months or years, they can reincarnate again, hopefully as a somewhat better or even a much better person, depending on how honest they were about wanting to grow, and desiring sincerely to make changes.

Adolf Hitler, like other great Aryan men and women, believed that we are immortal souls that live many lives in different bodies, times and families, and all this is designed so we can learn the lessons of life.

On the subject of the immortality of the soul, as opposed to the Jewish view, Adolf Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf, the second volume of which he wrote in 1925 here in this cabin on the Obersalzberg mountain in Berchtesgaden:

(Taken from this powerful video:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n63u-iHggSA)

“Due to his own original, special nature, the Jew cannot possess a true religious institution, if for no other reason because he lacks idealism in any form, and hence belief in a hereafter is absolutely foreign to him.

And a religion in the Aryan sense cannot be imagined which lacks the conviction of survival after death in some form.

Indeed, his Talmud is not a book to prepare a man for the hereafter, but only for a practical and profitable life in this world.“

Second, Hitler fiercely opposed atheism as BAD for society and the masses, and once he became chancellor, he dissolved all atheistic societies in Germany:

“We were convinced that the people needs and requires faith. We have therefore undertaken our fight against the atheism movement, and that not merely with a few theoretical declarations ” we have stamped it out.” Adolf Hitler, in a speech in Berlin on 24 Oct. 1933

As Hitler knew, and Alfred Rosenberg, and Dietrich Eckart, right in the third of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Learned_Elders_of_Zion) we read that the Jewish plan is to advocate atheism for the goyim:

“Eliminate religion; replace it with science and materialism.”

Now many are turned off by the Bible or the official Christianity of the various churches, but the key concepts and the reality of key religious doctrines are not limited to those three Abrahamic religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Such core ideas  as God the just and loving Creator, the immortality of your soul, the existence of good and obedient angels and of wicked, rebellious demons, of free will, of being judged in the afterlife, after you die, based on the goodness or wickedness of your heart, words and deeds, and being assigned to one of many kinds of heavens or hells based on what you deserve and what you need to learn.

In fact, all these core ideas which we mentally associate with the three Abrahamic religions were basically stolen by the Jews from the very Aryan religion of Zorastrianism in ancient Persia. They began appearing without any attribution ” without giving ay credit ” in Later Judaism.

Later Judaism was when the Jews had no more kings such as David or Solomon, and were not even living in Palestine any more. They had been conquered, then moved as trouble-makers out of Palestine, by the Assyrian and Babylonian Empires. Then they were living in exile in the major city of Babylon and actually happy there making money as merchants and slave traders. Then the entire area was conquered by the Aryan Persians, and they became subjects of the Persian Empire.

The Persian Empire conquered every powerful ancient civilization in the Near East, including both Egypt and Babylon, excepting only the freedom-loving Greeks who were on the European side of the Aegean Sea, such as Athens and Sparta.

The Persians’ religion was Zoroastrianism, named after the prophet Zoroaster, a white Persian.

The symbol of Zoroastrianism is Zoroaster on an eagle.

Later Judaism, having adopted these Aryan ideas, then passed them on 500 years later to its offshoot, Christianity, and then, 600 years after that, to another offshoot, Islam. But all these doctrines about the soul, the afterlife, God, and the battle between good and evil, were 100 percent Aryan in their origin.

As for the gods, all our white and Aryan ancestors believed in the existence of a Creator God and of various lesser gods, whether it was the Greeks, Romans, Kelts, the Vikings or, as discussed earlier, the Aryans of the East, in ancient India.

That is an undeniable fact, and we see to this very day the beautiful temples our white, pagan or heathen forefathers built to those gods and goddesses in whom they believed, and for whom they built very expensive and truly beautiful structures.

.

The Parthenon, Athens

Athena

The Pantheon in Rome honored, as its name means, “all the gods.”

Interior. Completed by the great emperor Hadrian, a man of high culture, multiple languages and also major military achievements, after almost two thousand years his “Pantheon” still boasts the world’s largest unreinforced concrete dome. Six million people a year visit it.

Were our white ancestors who believed in the gods and an afterworld just superstitious and contemptible fools?

Adolf Hitler literally had any German arrested for publishing writings saying that God was just “the Jew in the sky.” Hitler threw atheists in concentration camps as punishment for spreading atheistic pamphlets and books. That is exactly what the Gestapo under Heinrich Himmler did starting in 1933, after Hitler took power, with all so-called “freethinkers” and their clubs and organizations.

Heinrich Himmler, head of the German police

The hard truth is that you just cannot praise Hitler or national socialism and also preach atheism.

Oil portraits (now in California and in private hands) of Hitler’s parents, Klara and Alois, that hung at the Berghof. Hitler’s mother, whom he loved deeply, was a devout Catholic. 

 

Fournes-en-Weppe, near Lille, France; Hitler spent half of WWI at the front lines near here.

Amann in the Weimar period with Hitler

Amann as an SS officer

As previously stated, the sinister Protocols of the Elders of Zion advocate strongly that the goyim be made into atheists, and believe there is no God and no soul, just science and matter.

Then they will fear to die, because ” if they do not have a soul, then at the death of their body, they will be dead forever, a thought that causes a dread of death.

You end up with this depressing error ¦.

MOST average people, to be honest, and this is a huge problem, would prefer to live a long life as a cowardly slave than a short, brave life as a genuine hero.

In fact, as a result of this error, unless there is a military draft to make men fight (and a firing squad to prevent them from deserting), many men would simply refuse to make the supreme sacrifice.

Yes, they  would simply RUN rather than lay their life down for the most natural and obvious justifications: 1) the safety of their families, and 2) the survival and freedom of their nation.

Atheism is the dangerous delusion — promoted by Jews and their pseudo-scientific tools — that no God is watching over me, or judging what is in my heart, or seeing my deeds. I am then just a miserable, two-legged, strangely hairless kind of mammal, a biochemical conglomeration that after a brief run will soon be dead forever. 

Once this miserable world view takes over, then for most a hedonistic search for pleasure begins.

.

 

As for Dietrich Eckart, he is significant for two things:

1) His role shows Adolf Hitler’s willingness to be mentored and to learn from a man 20 years older, one who knew about show business, the theater and thus about performing and acting in public, and how to get crowds going, and enthusiastic and move them emotionally;

2) His private role in forming Hitler’s view of what a truly Aryan religion would be like. However, Hitler felt it unwise to publicly talk about religion himself; he did not want religious arguments; he said he was for positive Christian values, that Jesus fought the Jews, who hated Him in return and murdered Him, and he let it go at that.

What Hitler did do was allow the editor Alfred Rosenberg and the publisher Max Amann to just go ahead and publish Eckart’s writings without him ever openly “endorsing” them.

Dietrich Eckart’s plays really should be translated into English and performed. The play “Family Men” really moved me, I admired the mix of comedy and tragedy, and the ending was unforgettable ¦. Men who must work hard to feed their families, who have no savings due to salaries kept deliberately low, and thus they can never afford to quit, or speak out in protest, and thus risk being fired ¦. Men who are in effect on an economic leash, like a dog, at the beck and call of a tyrannical boss.

 

Eckart had one constant theme in his writings ” how we as souls pendulate between two very real worlds, two very real dimensions:

”the material, this earth, atoms, wood, stone, water, air, insects, plants, animals and humans, stars and galaxies, and

“the spiritual, the higher world and dimension whence we come to be born here as babies.

We are souls who come here to experience things; we are beings “from the other side.”

BUT we come into this physical dimension needing both feet firmly on the ground of material reality, and we must be practical to succeed in all manner of necessary tasks, from paying bills to raising kids and caring for our parents when aged.

Eckart accuses the Jews, however, of being only worldly, only carnal, only fleshly, and only material, and thus solely after the money, the sex, the power ” and, with the Jews, always after what for them is the sweetest prize of all, revenge.

Atheism

Dietrich Eckart was very influenced by the great French aristocratic writer, Roger Gougenot des Mousseaux (1805-76), who believed (drumroll!) that the Jews, this extraordinary, unique people who have no rivals in cunning or malevolence, are literally the product of demonic entities, thousands of years ago, mating with earthly women.

As Wikipedia says:

Henri-Roger Gougenot des Mousseaux (1805 “ 1876) was a French writer and journalist. (photo, right) He was the author of Le Juif, le judaà¯sme et la judaà¯sation des peuples chrétiens (The Jew, Judaism and the Judaization of the Christian Peoples, 1869). The work is said to have received the approval of Pope Pius IX.⁽¹⁾ It was later translated into German (ca. 1920) by Alfred Rosenberg.

gougenot-des-mousseaux-juifs-1869

Eckart, who worked very closely in Munich with both Alfred Rosenberg and Adolf Hitler, undoubtedly read Rosenberg’s translation of this work into German.

 

Eckart says that Jews basically have no soul at all, that they are mere instruments without conscience of a demonic power.

This would dovetail with my own views of the Jews as a race of psychopaths, as born criminals, bad-to-the-bone, useless creatures who exist in order to lie, steal, cheat, betray, torture, rape and murder.

https://johndenugent.com/english/they-hacked-my-psychopaths-in-power-article-here-it-is-again/

It is my further view that Jews descend largely from the prehistoric neanderthals, a hyper-violent, hyper-clannish and very woman-oppressing kind of primitive humans.

These neanderthals then became the semites of the Middle East.

From that race there came a sub-race of desperados, a horde of roaming, escaped criminals, exiles, rabble, receivers of stolen goods (“fences”), prostitutes, pimps, hitmen, archers for hire, and mercenaries, the kind of ne’er-do-wells and lowlifes who were thrown out of society, and told to “get out of town and don’t come back.”

These sociopathic scum that had separated out of the Near Eastern nations were known to the Egyptian and Hittite authorities as “the Habiru”. Who are they? Simply the Hebrews. And some Jewish authors themselves admit this.

These Habiru, this horde of nomadic thieves, were selected to be the chosen people of Yahweh, a demonic prince, an alien being, because they were criminals by nature and thus perfect for his goal of taking this planet over by lies, murder and usury theft for the benefit of his species.

Joseph Farrell, who has a PhD from Oxford University in England, has expounded on this, though to avoid persecution, he manages to never once use the word “Jew” to say so.

And thus, when the Jews lie without blushing, it is because they have no conscience that can be troubled.

They do not believe there is any higher world, any Truth with a capital T, any objective Reality ” just whatever story works for them. Whatever virtual reality they can tell, or “spin,” to the gullible goyim is good ” complete lies, partial truths or even some small and medium truths that are admitted solely in order to build up credibility with the gullible so a major lie can be believed later.

Yes, even telling a whole truth for a jew is useful as a means to an end. Creating trust and credibility is needed so the Big Lie that is being prepared for launch into the minds of the goyim will be believed.

This explains the prestige press, with all its deliberately dry, boring and seemingly factual style which characterizes the New York Times, the Washington Post, the London Times, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung in Germany, Le Monde in France, etc.

Their whole strategy is to be credible and accurate on the little facts ” names, dates, places, interviews with some Harvard expert ” so you will also believe the Big Lie which is the whole purpose of the paper, namely:

“that we need a one-world government,

“we need a police state to protect us from terrorists,

“we must mix all the races together to end racial conflict,

“and we must listen to and protect this wise, ancient, and gifted people who are the Jews, who only want to help us build a world of peace and brotherhood.

 

And his destiny, back in that life he had between 1889 and 1945, was to enter the world of politics.

But politics is, and has ever been, a very dirty business.

Why?

Because 1) it is the worst psychopaths in society who tend to gravitate into the world of politics ” egomaniacs, men and women greedy for money, sex, fame and power ” and they are precisely the sort that is ruthlessly willing and even happy to do anything to get them ¦. to lie, steal, defame, betray and murder, to start unnecessary wars, or murder their political rivals.

https://johndenugent.com/psychopaths-in-power/

The young Tony Blair

 

and politics is dirty also because of

2) the basic nature of the masses, of the people in general, of the voters, of the public.

The average Joe or Jill, regardless of their education level, is neither a devil nor an angel. Winston Churchill was anything but a hero to me, and in fact was a war criminal. But he was brilliant, and he said many trenchant things. One was this:

The sad truth is the average fellow is often ignorant, selfish and not terribly interested in hearing unpleasant truths about reality. He especially dislikes hearing that painful changes must be made and comforting myths abandoned. And no proof matters if he is determined not to listen.

The public actually wants to be flattered by being told how very right they are, because the majority, reincarnation would say, are young souls, recently arisen from the animal stage, humanimals for whom the truth is unimportant.

So democracy, meaning in Ancient Greek, supposedly “the rule of the average people,”  must end up absurd in actual practice. The demos, the people, is morally and intellectually mediocre, and so their democracy also is morally and intellectually mediocre.

Therefore, the great German poet Friedrich Schiller said that “votes should be weighed, not counted.”

For Adolf Hitler, the practical politician living in the Weimar parliamentary democracy, the trick would be to get both the right-wing conservative nationalists and the left-wing working-class socialists, who had been bitterly opposed for generations to each other, to unite, and under him, and this although the two groups had been raised for generations to despise, hate and fight against each other.

Hitler’s goal was to create something never seen before, a “national kind of socialism,” something that was both right and left, with a red flag for the left-wing workers combined with the right-wing colors of red, black and white, the colors of the Prussian kings.

Dietrich Eckart wrote in his essay Männer (“Men”), reflecting on the common German proverb “Politik verdirbt den Charakter” (“Men”)

“It is not politics that ruins character, but character that ruin politics. It is something unclean around the whole world ¦.. The man who is rich inside resists political activity ” as did Bismarck (who as the Iron Chancellor of Prussia 1862-90 unified and led Germany) for his whole life ” 

as if he sensed that its first and greatest danger to him was not something lurking to destroy his enjoyment of life but something threatening the evolution of his soul.”

.

So Eckart and Hitler both loved the people but saw that tough love without any delusions was the only way to really help and uplift them.

And now to the work by Dietrich Eckart and Adolf Hitler.

.

……The Flood happened

……Gary Webb would have been 69 this month

Gary Webb, a superb journalist who won a Pulitzer Prize (for a book on the devastating 1989 San Francisco earthquake) would have turned 69 this month, but the CIA murdered him in 2003 for another book.

It exposed how, for money and an illegal war, it started and ran the US crack-cocaine epidemic of the 1980s, which killed at least 10,000 Americans, almost all of them urban Blacks. …This shows the CIA does not care one bit about “the poor Blacks” (or any minorities, or Whites either, who all became the victims of a crack-induced, violent Black crime wave.)

Webb’s next book, which his “suicide” (TWO shots to the head……) stopped, was going to get much more specific about WHO in the US government and CIA is controlling drug operations, and about their narcotrafficking partner, the ISRAELI MOSSAD. The Israelis finance drugs, run money-laundering via Miami and New York banks, and train the hispanic locals to be torturers and hitmen for the drug cartels.

.

….A cheery note

My late wife and I once were serenaded in Alexandria, Virginia with nine different songs by a birdie. He alit on a post along a bike path and proceeded to give us a whole concert. At the end, we clapped! He then twitched his tail feathers in pride, literally bowed, and flew off all proud of himself.