TEACHER (cum caregiver), who caned the child for littering, etc., WRONGLY sentenced to 10 years? If he had nothing to do with GISBH, would his sentence be much lower?

TEACHER (cum caregiver) sentenced to 10 years in prison after admitting causing bodily harm to three children aged 10 to 12 in his care. the prison sentence will be served consecutively from the date of his arrest. Was the punishment excessive? – even Prime Minister Najib, who was sentenced to a total of 72 years, was NOT allowed to serve his sentence consecutively, but concurrently, so only 12 years.

But this ‘teacher’ was sentenced to prison

…former Prime Minister Najib for SEVEN offenses and sentenced to a total of 72 years and fines

For the three criminal breach of trust Under Article 409 of the Criminal Code, he ordered Najib to serve 10 years for each count.

Najib was also ordered to serve 10 years in prison for each of the three
money laundering counts under section 4(1)(b) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activity Act 2001 (AMLATFPUAA).

He was sentenced to 12 years for abuse of power…

Let’s take a look at the crimes he was convicted of…

…hit the victim’s right hand with a stick to make a messDuring the operation, a walking stick and a mobile phone containing a video recording of the suspect hitting the child five times were seized.

The caretaker, also a teacher at Miftahul Hikmah Integrated Islamic Primary School, admitted this during which the second victim was struck six times on the palm, possibly causing injuries.

In a separate case he also admitted pressing another victim’s chest with his knee, causing bruises and exposing old wounds on the thumb.

attacking the third victim with a stick, a broomstick and a badminton racketall of which were stored in the staff room.

It is true that they were crimes – but rightly so, a sentence of ten years was excessive – in my opinion a sentence of one to four years would have been more just.

What happened to the teacher, who punished children by asking them to stand out under the scorching sun…the case where an 11-year-old student, after being punished by having to stand under the hot sun, developed heat exhaustion or heat stroke, which also caused nerve damage and has now turned a previously healthy child into a person with a disability. Minister Fadhlina Sidek should apologize and ensure that perpetrators of teachers charged in court for ‘torture’ of an 11-year-old, asked to stand under the sun, have now become a person with disabilities?

Has that teacher been charged and tried yet? This was a serious case of torture and a normal child was disabled for life.

EGG-SHELL principle – The rule captures the idea that if someone is particularly vulnerable (for example, has a skull as thin as an eggshell), someone who injures him or her is still responsible for the extent of the damage, even if it is unforeseeable because that’s what a non-sensitive person would do. have not suffered the same damage.

In criminal law, the general rule is that the accused must “take their victims as they find them”, as reflected in the judgment of Lord Justice Lawton in R v. Blaue (1975), in which the accused was held responsible for killing his victims. victim,.

So. the excuse that the child was exceptionally weak, and that is why he suffered heat stroke and permanent mental disability, is NOT A DEFENSE for the teacher who punished the child by asking him to stand under the hot sun. Charge that teacher immediately if he is still not charged.

Regarding the GISBH concierge: please note that there was no lawyer present, and without a lawyer it is dangerous.

Why did he confess to all the crimes in the first place? Video recording: who made the recording? An accomplice? WHY? Since there was no TRIAL, that won’t even be challenged.

What ‘confession’? In Malaysia, confessions made after arrest and detention are no longer admissible in court if presented by the prosecution – so which confession? When he was charged, he allegedly only pleaded guilty to the charge.

Why did he plead guilty?

Of course most people knew that after the HUGE crackdown on GISBH this conviction of a GIBSH staff was necessary? So was he pressured or ‘threatened’ to confess? As we know, to date we have not heard any condemnation of sexual abuse and sodomy – the very accusations that made people very angry…

A fair sentence for the 23-year-old who pleaded guilty would have been fair.

Since this guy may still not have a lawyer, he most likely wouldn’t even appeal the rather ‘UNJUST’ 10 year sentence – because the appeal has to be done within a certain time… and so he will be in jail for 10 years languish in prison. – out in 2034??

September 11 GISBH – What’s happening? Are the actions in accordance with the law? PAS raises concerns about unfair targeting of business premises?

The caretaker of the GISBH Klang care home is sentenced to 10 years in prison for abusing children

Muhammad Barur Rahim, 23, appeared before the Klang Sessions Court today and confessed to committing the crime at Al-Mahabbah Welfare and Education Organization in Bukit Raja, Klang Utara, in July 2024. — Photo by Yusof Mat Isa

By Anis Zalani

Thursday, Sep 26, 2024 1:23 PM MYT

KLANG, Sept 26 — A caretaker of a GISB Holdings Sdn Bhd (GISBH)-linked house in Klang has been sentenced to 10 years in prison after admitting to causing bodily harm to three children aged 10 to 12 years under his care .

According to the prosecutor, he hit the victim’s right hand with a stick because he had left litter behind.

He was charged under Section 31(1)(a) of the Child Act 2001, which carries a maximum penalty of a fine of RM50,000 or imprisonment for up to 20 years, or both upon conviction.

The sentence was delivered by Judge Noridah Adam of the Sessions Court.

The prosecutor also said that a team of investigators from the D14 Criminal Investigation Division and officers from the Social Affairs Department raided the property earlier this month after receiving information about child exploitation.

A walking stick and a cell phone containing a video recording belonging to the suspect who hit the child five times were seized during the operation.

The caretaker, who is also a teacher at the Miftahul Hikmah Integrated Islamic Primary School, known person to strike the second victim six times on the palm, possibly causing injuries.

In a separate case, he also admitted pressing another victim’s chest with his knee, causing bruising and exposing old wounds on the thumb.

Barur too
known person to attacking the third victim with a stick, a broomstick and a badminton racket, all of which were stored in the staff room.

The Prosecutor has asked the court to consider imposing an additional sentence requiring the suspect to enter into a bond to maintain good behavior for a period of time deemed appropriate by the court.

Failure to comply with the bond conditions may result in an additional fine of up to RM10,000 or imprisonment for up to five years, or both.

The prison sentence will be served consecutively from the date of his arrest. – Malaysian Post, 26/9/2024