House District 56: Richardson vs Navetta

AURORA | Elbert County government doesn’t often make headlines, but it did earlier this year when dramatically raising the pay of two top county staffers and skirting government transparency rules in the process.

Chris Richardson was one of Elbert’s three elected county commissioners who hiked the county attorney’s manager’s pay by 52% and the county manager’s salary 57% — a move he described as “timely” and “well deserved.”

Critics slammed it as outlandish, especially in a cash-strapped county whose workers long have complained they’re underpaid. Five county residents are suing Richardson and fellow commissioners for approving the contracts in secret, outside of Colorado’s open meetings law.

 Richardson seems politically unscathed by the controversy, having easily snagged the Republican nomination for House District 56, a seat held for three terms by fellow Republican and former Arapahoe County Commissioner Rod Bockenfeld, who is not seeking re-election because of health reasons.

Even Democrat challenger Alessandra Navetta acknowledges Richardson is likely to prevail in a district whose electorate is about 12% Democrat, 40% unaffiliated and 45% Republican. 

“I know he’s considered the favorite. But somebody needed to run against him,” she said.

House District includes the entirety of Elbert, Lincoln, Kit Carson, and Cheyenne counties, plus the eastern rural parts of Arapahoe, Adams, and El Paso counties. A 140-mile stretch along the Interstate 70 corridor from Denver International Airport to the Kansas border runs through it. Its 11,000 square miles are mostly rural, with a horizon strewn with fields growing corn, hay, grain sorghum, oats, millet, sunflowers and wheat, and with an average of only eight residents per square mile.

Richardson, 58, lives outside of Elizabeth in unincorporated Elbert County. He moved there in 2010 before retiring a year later from a 23-year career in the Army as a colonel and brigade commander.

He and his wife, a real estate broker in Elizabeth, educated their now 19-year-old daughter in the Elizabeth School District, whose board he was elected to in his first stint in politics. He went on to serve the past eight years on Elbert County’s three-member elected county commission. 

Richardson defends his move — and that of his two fellow commissioners — earlier this year drastically raising the salaries of County Manager Shawn Fletcher and County Attorney Bart Greer by more than $80,000 to $220,000 out of public view. He asserts that their decision was covered under a provision of Colorado’s open meetings law regarding the “day-to-day oversight of property or supervision of employees by county commissioners.” Still, to avoid the appearance of secrecy, the commission now aims to vote on the contracts in a public meeting Oct. 9.

Richardson said he is a strong believer in government transparency, citing his work ensuring that county commission meetings are live-streamed and videotaped.

“Certainly we have not always gotten everything right, but we’re not interested in surprising anybody,” he said. “I’ve always believed we should be doing all we can to ensure citizens know what we’re doing.”

He is proud to have helped lead his community through the COVID pandemic, which ended relatively fewer lives in Elbert than in other Colorado counties even though its population is about ten years older than the statewide average.

“We were able to get information to our citizens, accommodate public health and public safety aspects and still preserve some semblance of normal life in our county. I think that’s a pretty good accomplishment,” he said in an interview earlier this month. 

He is also proud of the regional and statewide work he has done as a county commissioner. He has represented the Eastern Plains on Colorado Counties Inc., the statewide coalition of county officials, and served as the chair of the East Central Council of Local Governments; co-chaired the regional transportation body for Northeast Colorado and served on a statewide transportation advisory council; and sat on task forces seeking to abate opioid use and that reviewed recent legislation for a property tax reduction.

He told the Sentinel he planned to retire from politics after being term-limited off Elbert County Commission this year but decided to run to replace Bockenfeld “as a way to give back to the community.” 

If elected, Richardson aims to protect agricultural land and water in that part of the state and to ensure that roads on the Eastern Plains are safe and well maintained.  Those, he says, are the top issues in the district. 

As he sees it, far too many bills are introduced each legislative session. “We’ve hit the point that we’re making laws just to fix other laws,” he said, noting he would work to ensure that legislation “helps rather than hurts people, and doesn’t create unintended consequences.”

The conservative Republican wants to curtail efforts to regulate gun ownership in Colorado, saying most of that legislation “should go away.” He opposes abortion and says, “I am disappointed at the direction Colorado has taken” by allowing the procedure. He is concerned that schools and government have usurped parental rights when it comes to mental health assessments and decisions about their childrens’ gender identities. He’s also concerned about an influx of undocumented immigrants in Colorado — the result, he says, “of a completely uncontrolled border.” He is alarmed by what some far-right politicians have deemed this election season as a crisis with Tren de Aragua, a Venezuelan prison gang also known as TdA, in Aurora despite assertions by police that the group is not a significant threat. 

“When you hear of activity of truly organized gangs and criminal enterprises nearby, it’s very concerning,” he said.

Although he shares the views of some right-wing politicians who have fueled fears about the gang — U.S. Rep. Lauren Boebert, Aurora Councilwoman Danielle Jurinsky and Donald Trump among them — he said his leadership style is far more low-key. 

“I’m pretty slow and steady in how I do business. Grandstanding doesn’t do a lot for me,” he said. 

Richardson had raised about $12,000 in contributions by early October. He has campaigned mainly at fairs, festivals, rodeos and events leading up to the Republican primary in Congressional District 4, which drew heavy turnout because 11 candidates ran, including Boebert, the winner.

There have been no debates in the House race that Navetta, Richardson’s Democratic opponent, cites voter affiliation statistics in acknowledging she has a slim chance of winning. 

The 78-year-old worked for 15 years as a nurse and for 22 years as a medical malpractice attorney. She lives on five acres in Elizabeth where she keeps two horses, serves as a trustee of the Pines and Plains Libraries and vice-chair of the Elbert County Democratic County. She stepped up to run in the race “no other Democrat wanted” because, she said, “we really need two parties, two points of view” in any election. 

“We can’t have people just waltzing into office without being challenged,” she added, citing Richardson’s involvement in the secret pay raise controversy as reason enough to run.

Navetta has logged 5,000 miles driving around the district, sometimes dragging some of her grandchildren with her, in a grassroots campaign for which she has raised about $4,000.

She speaks to voters about the need for affordable, quality health care in the district, where the few rural hospitals are barely surviving.

“We need to find solutions to funding and staffing these facilities so that the residents of these communities do not have to travel for hours for medical care,” she said. 

She also is pushing for more affordable post-secondary education in the district because she says residents have too far to travel to attend college-level classes. She would, if elected, push to use high schools and other community buildings to host college-level programs. She also would try to glean federal funding for more reliable, affordable internet connectivity, which could help locals access more health care providers and online education

“Obtaining these funds and improving internet access will result in an improvement in many aspects of the lives of the citizens of HD56,” she said. 

Born in Italy, raised in Canada, and having spent most of her career in and near Detroit, Navetta knows she speaks faster and with more intensity than many residents of her large district. She hopes her energy and enthusiasm, and her status as “the only one in this race who’s not a professional politician” will prod voters, especially unaffiliated ones, to check her name on their ballots. 

“I’m at a point in my life where I want to serve people,” she said.”I’m not counting on winning, but it’s not an impossibility.” 

Meet Chris Richardson

Richardson, 58, was born and raised in Springfield, Massachusetts. He studied mechanical engineering on a ROTC scholarship at the University of Pennsylvania. He went on to serve as an anti-tank missile platoon leader in Operation Desert Storm, then as an air assault rifle platoon leader and a commander of a maintenance supply unit.

Chris Richardson

His military career stationed him at various bases throughout the U.S., the Pentagon, Germany and South Korea, and included stints in the Middle East and Baltics. He retired from the Army after serving at Fort Carson as commander of a support brigade, running maintenance and logistics for the Army’s 4th Infantry Division.

He began his political career on the board of the Elizabeth School District and has served for nearly eight years on Elbert County’s three-member commission. 

He is married with one daughter who is a sophomore at Metro State University in Denver. 

Allesandra Navetta, 78, was born in Italy after World War II. Her father, seeking to make a better living than he could in their economically ravaged country, immigrated to Canada, where her mother and she followed a few years later, not speaking a word of English. 

Alesandra Navetta

Navetta was raised and educated in Windsor, Canada, then married an American and moved to the Detroit area where she worked for 15 years as a nurse, including 10 years in a neonatal intensive care unit. She then went to law school and worked for 22 years as a lawyer specializing in medical malpractice. She also raised three sons.

She lives in Elizabeth where she raises horses and dogs, volunteers on the local library board and serves as vice-chair of the Elbert County Democratic County.

After astonishing property value increases in the past two years, voters and the Legislature have moved to change property tax laws in an effort to reduce property taxes for residents. Did everyone get it right? What would you want to see changed?

  1. This is a complicated issue. While residents in Colorado are pleased that the value of their homes has increased (since ones home is often ones greatest asset), with the rise in property value comes a rise in property taxes. And many citizens have an aversion to paying taxes let alone higher taxes. Given the increase in population, taxes are needed to to pay for roads, fire, police and public health services. I believe the state is trying to achieve a middle ground. Raise enough tax revenue to pay for services, limiting the rate of tax increases and balancing the budget. I remains to be seen if the government measures will be effective in keeping taxes down, while paying for essential government services. Perhaps more creative measures should be looked at. For example, reducing the amount of taxes to be paid by residents on fixed incomes and collecting the balance when the house is sold. Tax credits could be offered for homes that are more energy efficient or in specific locales. This is an area that needs to be meaningfully addressed.

State lawmakers recently passed a handful of measures addressing the problem of affordable housing. What more, if anything, can the state do to address what to many families in Aurora and the metroplex is a critical problem?

2.   Availability of affordable housing is nothing new. Young singles or couples seeking to buy this first home have always had this obstacle before them, especially in

      desirable cities such as Denver. Seniors seeking to downsize face similar problems.

      An option would be for the government to offer to pay, for first time homeowners,

      part or all of the down payment ,which would then be gradually repaid as a low or no

      or low interest loan. Offering low interest government loans would be another option.

      Encouraging builders to construct low cost homes to meet the needs of individuals

      or small families might be an option. In return the builder would receive tax credits.

      Before embarking on such programs the state must consider all the unintended

      consequences that may result.

With available water sources all essentially determined, and water storage projects limited, should the state require that new home and business development be limited to provable, existing water supplies committed to the county or town permitting new construction?

3.   Water is a scarce, precious resource in Colorado. Development is progressing 

      rapidly. Unfortunately many communities are eager to obtain the increased tax

      revenue and they fail to consider or evaluate the impact that increased growth

      will have on its limited supply of water. Before any development can be approved

      by local government, there should be a requirement that a water board made up of

      scientists with knowledge and expertise in water and geology provide a report

      stating that there is adequate water for the development being proposed. The report

      must be based on the best science available. Once a project is approved the

      developer must provide the buyer with information regarding water issues effecting

      the property and attesting to the fact that there is enough water available for

      household use. Allowing new development in places where water is limited not

      only effects the buyers in the development, but also effects surrounding homeowners

      whose wells may be compromised by the new homes tapping into the aquifers.

      A home without water is worthless.

Would you support a ban on assault-style firearms?

4.   Yes. Assault firearms are weapons of war. They serve no purpose for a hunter or

      as personal protection. The Supreme Court has ruled that the Second Amendment

      allows citizens of the United States to possess firearms. Banning assault weapons

      does not impact our Second Amendment rights. It just makes us all a little safer.

Highway congestion statewide is a critical problem. Should the state end its toll-lane/Express Lane program and make those lanes on state and federal highways just additional lanes?

5.  I do not have a strong opinion regarding the express lanes on toll roads. While it may

     be desirable to have express lanes for vehicles that need to get to certain locations

     quickly. It is also fair that that they pay a fee for the privilege. Unfortunately, heavy

     traffic is unavoidable in desirable states such as Colorado. Leave early.

• What food do you hate most?

I like most foods. I have never eaten snails (escargot) and will probably never do so.

• What was the last book you read? Be honest.

The last books I listened to on Audible are the Thursday Morning Murder Club. It is a

series of four books about four senior citizens living in a senior community in England,

who solve murders. It is subtlety humorous despite the topic. The four old people come from diverse, significant backgrounds and use their skills in solving complex murder mysteries. I found myself audibly chuckling at some of the things they say and do. There are also some touching sad moments, as one would expect when the theme is aging.

• What’s your favorite TV show of all time?. 

There is no one favorite TV show. I watch a lot of news to stay abreast ( until it gets depressing) and foreign subtitled programs. Of late I have been watching old Startrek

episodes, which are quite humorous, given the primitive special effects of the 1960’s.

What is good about the program is that the crew is made up of ethically diverse people

who all get along. Something we should strive for in 2024 and beyond.

• Dog person? Cat person? Both? Neither? 

I love all animals. Have had both dogs and cats throughout the years, who have all lived to a ripe old age. My true love is horses. I have had horses at home for many years.

We have deer and turkeys roaming through our yard and resting on our lawn throughout the year. It is a thrill to see them when they come by. I have named our home “ Paradise Found Ranch.”

  1. After astonishing property value increases in the past two years, voters and the Legislature have moved to change property tax laws in an effort to reduce property taxes for residents. Did everyone get it right? What would you want to see changed?

Just because a home’s value goes up, doesn’t mean the governments that provide local services need to capture all the potential increased revenues available from taxing that higher value. 

As a member of the 19-person State Property Commission that was authorized by legislation in 2023 Special Session, a County Commissioner and former School Board Member who have levied taxes, I think the legislature took good steps in the right direction. The caps on revenue in the final bill of the last special session will go a long way to reducing future spikes and providing predictability for both taxpayers and local governments.

Without action, property tax rates would have spiked a second time as temporary reductions ended. The actions taken during the two recent special sessions and last regular session, were helpful and brought some increased parity between residential and business properties, but more needs to be done in that area.

Finally, the role of local governments in setting mill rates cannot be overlooked. My board rebated a total of $2 million in property taxes this year and are budgeting for an additional $1 million as we set the 2025 budget. All local taxing entities could have reduced their levies. Unfortunately, most chose to collect all they could. Citizens should question those choices.

  • State lawmakers recently passed a handful of measures addressing the problem of affordable housing. What more, if anything, can the state do to address what to many families in Aurora and the metroplex is a critical problem?

Housing prices have soared and there is a lack of affordable housing.  In order to address this issue, we must address the root causes of the increases and address those that can be influenced by state and local governments.  Simply subsidizing either construction or payments, doesn’t actually reduce the real costs – it simply shifts who pays.  

Over the decades regulation and statute have combined to make large and expensive single-family homes the most profitable and least risky product for developers to deliver.  If we want to change this, we must change the regulatory environment.  Construction Defect Laws must be amended to reduce the cost and risk to builders who want to provide entry level products like townhomes and condos.  Which while desperately needed to provide lower cost alternatives, make up only a fraction of the units built.  Adiditonally, the continued demand for changes to building code – while well intended – add considerable cost.  Electrification, energy efficiency, and hardening against wild fire, are all laudable efforts, they add more expense.

Finally, increased exposure to lawsuits brought by nearly 50 new and expanded causes for legal action passed into law in just the last 5 years, increases the costs to all businesses including those involved in land development and the building trades. 

A review of local and state statute, regulation and ordinances to identify areas that add expense and eliminate or modify to achieve similar results as lesser expense, can go a long way toward reducing costs.

  • With available water sources all essentially determined, and water storage projects limited, should the state require that new home and business development be limited to provable, existing water supplies committed to the county or town permitting new construction?

Water is a finite resource and should be treated that way.  Whether allocated or appropriated from flowing waters on the surface or from our aquifers, we need to do more to extend the life of what we have.  Storage for waters that flow to the Colorado River in the West and the Republican River in the east so we can retain water not required to be provided to other statr4s via existing compacts is essential, as is supporting reuse and recycling.

Within my county, which already requires a proven 300-year supply for new subdivisions, we have the state’s first Cat III level reuse system in place in a one local water and sanitation district, and another is pursuing community level direct re-use.  We need to be open to and encourage all techniques and emerging technologies that extend our finite water supply.     

  • Would you support a ban on assault-style firearms?

No. Banning a firearm because it is of a certain “style” is an infringement on our citizen’s constitutional rights.  More needs to be done to address gang violence and mental health issues that result in needly deaths in our communities.  Disarming law-abiding citizens is never the right answer.    

  • Highway congestion statewide is a critical problem. Should the state end its toll-lane/Express Lane program and make those lanes on state and federal highways just additional lanes?

CDOT is in dire need of reform.  Its most senior leadership is no longer focused on moving people and goods efficiently throughout the state but has placed its priorities on climate justice and transit.  We need more pavement and the pavement we have must be better maintained.  Toll and Express lanes have been created only because third parties have been engaged to build them on a for profit basis.  While I do not think these agreements can be broken, they do demonstrate that is the will is there – capacity expansion can occur.

What food do you hate most?  Brussel Sprouts

• What was the last book you read? Be honest.  The Tipping Point by Malcolm Gladwell

• What’s your favorite TV show of all time?  Friends

• Dog person? Cat person? Both? Neither?  Both

You May Also Like

More From Author