free eBooks+Ignorance is Blitz, China after USSR

This weeks free eBooks:

Review link: https://amazon.com/review/create-review?&asin=B06XGJQ88N

https://amazon.com/review/create-review?&asin=B0B3VRL5YF

Share

Russia’s main method of information war is projection. Accuse others of doing exactly what you yourself are doing to enrage him and distract from your own nefarious deeds. It works just about every time and best of all degrades the ideas of truth and certitude. Putin isn’t in a war for the truth. Putin is in a war on the truth. He does not need or want to convince you. He just wants to confuse and disrupt you and yours by causing them to question what the truth really is and ultimately whether truth even exists.

That’s how the mafia state rolls. The reason they do it is it is cheap and often works. Likewise for Kompromat aka Blackmail: Have fun with that prostitute, too bad she’s really 13 and it’s all on film Mr. Congressman.

Here is the review link if you would like to write a review and/or post a star ratings *_*

https://amazon.com/review/create-review?&asin=B0D9C5MKQ7

I am working on German, French, Ukrainian, Hungarian and Chinese versions of this book, and can produce more languages. If you would like to be a volunteer editor to get your free translated copy in the language of your choice just write [email protected] The logic is that when those who might oppose Ukraine see with perfect clarity the fact that Ukraine has many paths to victory, while Russia has none, they will then remain neutral or even smartly aid Ukraine.

You are probably expecting me to write something about Kursk. Too bad I’m not a blabbermouth. Ukraine will win.

Because the USA/West often misperceive China, and China likewise but to a lesser degree misperceives Russia their policies are inapt, but in differing ways, with the Chinese far too hoptimistic and friendly toward the Mafia State ruling from Moscow, and also about the path for Chinese development. The misperceptions are so great partly because of language and cultural differences and consequent cognitive over-load. This article explains Western errors with respect to the post USSR Russian Federation and how the West is making similar mistakes about China. When we understand our own flaws and errors better we are less likely to repeat or reiterate them. When we properly understand China we will clearly see the USA can, should, and most likely will contain China militarily. Yet at the same time we can expect continued or even intensified trans-pacific trade and investment. To see it though we should understand why China has reacted to the post USSR world as it has, this will enable wise policy to persuade and thus prevail since it is founded on real world facts rather than fantasies hopes or unjustified opinions, to say nought of outright deceptions.

Thesis statement: The West’s approach to reform and understanding of communist dictatorships, including China, has been consistently flawed, and their current views on China are likewise incorrect (from over-optimism to unwarranted pessimism, leading to under-performance and over-reaction. Joy).

• The West’s path for reform in Russia and Ukraine has been disastrous.

• China’s path, on the other hand, has been successful.

• The West has a history of misunderstanding China and communist dictatorships.

• The West’s views on China are often distorted by personal biases and interests.

• China is evolving towards liberalism and greater individual freedoms, contrary to Western perceptions.

Outline:

I. The Failure of Western-Backed Reform in Russia and Ukraine
II. China is a Mercantilist State Capitalist (state-led investment and export-oriented growth)
III. China’s Communist History & Ideology
IV. From Totalitarianism to Authoritarianism
V. The West’s Continued Misunderstanding of China
VI. China’s Economic Development
VII. Conclusion

The collapse of communism in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union in the late 1980s and early 1990s presented a unique opportunity for the West to shape the economic and political development of Eastern Europe and Central Asia. The Western powers, led by the United States, saw this as a chance to promote their own brand of democracy and capitalism, and to integrate these countries into the global economy. However, the results of these efforts have been disastrous, and the consequences of Western-backed reform in Russia and Ukraine are a powerful reminder of the limitations of Western-style reform in post-communist countries.

One of the most significant failures of Western-backed reform in Russia was the implementation of “shock therapy” economic policies. This approach, advocated by Western economists and policymakers, involved rapid privatization of state-owned enterprises, liberalization of trade and investment, and reduction of government spending. The idea was to create a free market economy overnight, and to stimulate economic growth through foreign investment and competition.

However, the results were catastrophic. The rapid privatization of state-owned enterprises led to the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few oligarchs, who used their newfound power to exploit the economy for their own gain. The liberalization of trade and investment led to a flood of cheap imports, which destroyed domestic industries and led to widespread unemployment. The reduction of government spending led to a collapse of social services, including healthcare and education.

The consequences of these policies were devastating. Russia’s GDP declined by over 40% between 1990 and 1998, and Russia’s poverty rate increased from 2% to over 30%. The life expectancy of Russian men declined by over 5 years, and Russia’s infant mortality rate increased by over 50%. The economic crisis also lead to increased crime, corruption, and social unrest.

Ukraine’s experience with Western-backed reform was similar. The country’s economy was also subject to “shock therapy” policies, which led to a rapid decline in GDP and a significant increase in poverty. The Ukraine’s industrial sector was decimated, and the agricultural sector was unable to compete with cheap imports. The social consequences of these policies were also severe, with a significant decline in life expectancy and a rise in infant mortality.

The failure of Western-backed reform in Russia and Ukraine can be attributed to a number of factors. One of the most significant was the lack of understanding of the local context and the specific challenges faced by these countries. Western policymakers and economists assumed that the same policies that had worked in Western countries would work in post-communist countries, without taking into account the unique historical, cultural, and economic context of these countries.

Another factor was the dominance of ideology over pragmatism. Western policymakers were driven by a desire to promote their own brand of democracy and capitalism, rather than to find solutions that were tailored to the specific needs of these countries. This led to a “one-size-fits-all” approach, which ignored the complexities and nuances of the local context.

The failure of Western-backed reform in Russia and Ukraine shows the limits of Western-style reform in post-communist countries. The rapid implementation of “shock therapy” policies, the lack of understanding of local facts, and the dominance of ideology over pragmatism all contributed to the disastrous consequences of these policies. A more nuanced and informed approach is needed, one that takes into account the unique challenges and opportunities of each country, and that prioritizes pragmatism over ideology.

While the West was busy promoting its own brand of democracy and capitalism in Russia and Ukraine, China was quietly pursuing a different path. The Chinese government saw what happened to the USSR and what happened to Russia thereafter and took conscious steps to avoid those outcomes through economic and political reforms. China’s economic and political development since the 1980s has been nothing short of remarkable, with the country emerging as a major global power. China’s success can be attributed to its unique approach, which combines elements of state-led capitalism and mercantilism.

One of the key features of China’s economic model is its emphasis on state-led investment and development. The Chinese government has played a crucial role in guiding the country’s economic development, investing heavily in infrastructure, education, and research and development. This approach, funded by Western loans and exports to the West, has allowed China to leapfrog traditional stages of development and to rapidly industrialize.

For example, China’s investment in high-speed rail has been a major driver of economic growth, connecting major cities and regions and facilitating the movement of goods and people. China’s high-speed rail network is now the largest in the world, with over 29,000 kilometers of track. This investment has not only improved transportation efficiency but also created new economic opportunities and stimulated growth in related industries.

Another key feature of China’s economic model is its emphasis on export-oriented growth. China has become the world’s largest exporter, with a significant portion of its GDP coming from exports. This approach has allowed China to take advantage of its comparative advantage in labor-intensive manufacturing and to rapidly industrialize.

For example, China’s textile industry was an early key driver of Chinese exports, with the country becoming the world’s largest producer of textiles. China’s textile industry was able to take advantage of the low labor costs and a relatively educated and very large workforce to produce high-quality textiles at better prices.

China’s economic model has also been characterized by a strong emphasis on state-owned enterprises (SOEs). SOEs have played a crucial role in China’s economic development, driving growth and innovation in key sectors such as energy, finance, and technology.

For example, China’s state-owned oil company, CNPC, has been a major driver of growth in the country’s energy sector. CNPC has invested heavily in exploration and production, and has become one of the world’s largest oil companies.

China’s mercantilist approach has also been characterized by trade protectionism. China has used a range of policies, including tariffs and quotas, to protect its domestic industries and promote exports. For example, China’s use of tariffs has been a major factor in the country’s success in the solar panel industry. China has imposed tariffs on imported solar panels, which has allowed domestic manufacturers to gain a competitive advantage and to drive growth in the industry.

China’s economic model has been successful in achieving rapid economic growth and industrialization. However, it has also been criticized for its lack of transparency and accountability, as well as its environmental and social impacts. Despite these challenges, China’s economic model has been successful in achieving its goals, and has provided a unique alternative to the Western model of capitalism. China’s approach has been characterized by a strong emphasis on state-led development, export-oriented growth, and trade protectionism.

The success of China’s economic model has also been driven by the China’s unique cultural and historical context. China’s Confucian heritage has emphasized the importance of social harmony and collective well-being, which has contributed to the country’s emphasis on state-led development and social welfare.

For example, China’s social welfare system has been a major factor in the China’s success in reducing poverty and improving living standards. China’s social welfare system has provided a range of benefits, including healthcare, education, and housing, which has helped to improve the well-being of citizens and to promote social stability.

In conclusion, China’s economic model has been successful in achieving rapid economic growth and industrialization. The country’s unique approach, which combines elements of state-led capitalism and mercantilism, has provided a alternative to the Western model of capitalism. China’s emphasis on state-led development, export-oriented growth, and trade protectionism has driven growth and innovation in key sectors, and has helped to promote social welfare and stability.

The West’s misunderstanding of China’s communist past is a significant factor in its failure to understand China’s current development. This misunderstanding stems from a simplistic and inaccurate view of China’s history, which has been shaped by the West’s own ideological biases and assumptions.

One of the most significant misconceptions about China’s communist past is the idea that Mao Zedong’s regime was uniformly brutal and repressive. While it is true that Mao’s regime was responsible for significant human rights abuses and economic mismanagement, it is also important to recognize the progress made in literacy, women’s rights, and healthcare in the Mao era. Mao’s regime played a crucial role in promoting China’s independence and sovereignty, and in resisting Japanese imperialism.

However, the West has often ignored all that and instead focused only on the negative aspects of Mao’s regime such as the famine resulting from the failed “Great Leap Forward” and the destruction of cultural objects and human lives by the Red Guards during the cultural revolution. Simplistic inaccurate views of China’s communist past contributes to the West’s misunderstanding of contemporary China.

Rather than an evil monolith, the Chinese communist movement was characterized by significant divisions and internal debates, with different factions and leaders advocating for different policies and approaches. For example, the Chinese communist movement was divided between the Maoist faction, which advocated for a more radical and revolutionary approach, and the Dengist faction, which advocated for a more pragmatic and reform-oriented approach. These divisions, often believed to be factional conflicts between rival clans in the West, play a significant role in shaping China’s development and influence the country’s politics and economy to this day.

The West’s misunderstanding of China’s communist history and ideology has also been influenced by its own ideological biases and assumptions. The West has often viewed communism as a monolithic and evil ideology, with little attention paid to the significant differences between different forms of communism, such as Maoism, Leninism, and Juche. Additionally, the West has often failed to recognize the ways in which communism has been adapted and modified in different cultural and historical contexts. This lack of understanding has led to a simplistic and inaccurate view of China’s communist past, which has in turn contributed to the West’s misunderstanding of China’s current development.

The West’s misunderstanding of China’s communist past and failure to understand China’s history and culture has led to a lack of trust and cooperation between the two sides, and has contributed to the tensions and conflicts that have characterized their relations in recent years.

In order to improve its relations with China, the West must develop a more nuanced and accurate understanding of China’s communist past. This requires a willingness to engage with the complexities and nuances of China’s history, and to recognize the ways in which communism has been adapted and modified in different cultural and historical contexts. By developing a more nuanced and accurate understanding of China’s communist past, the West can build a more constructive and cooperative relationship with China, and can work together to address the significant challenges and opportunities that face the world today.

China’s political system has undergone significant changes since the 1980s, evolving from a totalitarian regime to a more authoritarian system. This evolution has been driven by a combination of factors, including economic reforms, social changes, and the rise of new technologies.

One of the key features of China’s totalitarian regime was the complete control of the Communist Party over all aspects of society. The party controlled the media, education, and the economy, and dissent was not tolerated. However, with the introduction of economic reforms in the 1980s, the party began to relax its control over the economy, allowing for the emergence of private enterprise and foreign investment.

This led to a significant increase in economic growth and a rise in living standards, but it also created new challenges for the party. As the economy grew, so did the middle class, and with it, demands for greater political freedom and participation. The party responded to these demands by introducing limited reforms, such as the creation of village elections and the expansion of civil society organizations.

However, these reforms were limited, and the party maintained its control over the political system. The party’s leadership continued to be determined by a small group of elite leaders, and dissent was still not tolerated. The party’s control over the media and education also remained strong, and the party continued to use propaganda and censorship to shape public opinion.

Despite these limitations, China’s political system has continued to evolve, and the party has introduced new reforms aimed at increasing transparency and accountability. For example, the party has introduced a new system of government procurement, which allows for greater transparency and competition in the awarding of government contracts.

The party has also introduced new measures aimed at increasing citizen participation in government, such as the creation of citizen feedback mechanisms and the expansion of public consultations. These reforms have been driven by a recognition that the party needs to be more responsive to the needs and concerns of citizens, and that it needs to be more transparent and accountable in its decision-making.

However, despite these reforms, China’s political system remains authoritarian, and the party maintains its control over the political system. The party’s leadership continues to be determined by a small group of elite leaders, and dissent is still not tolerated. The party’s control over the media and education also remains strong, and the party continues to use propaganda and censorship to shape public opinion.

The implications of China’s authoritarian political system are significant, both domestically and internationally. Domestically, the system limits the ability of citizens to participate in government and to express their opinions freely. Internationally, the system raises concerns about China’s human rights record and its commitment to democratic values. However, China’s authoritarian system has been successful in maintaining stability and promoting economic growth. The system has allowed the party to maintain control over the political system, and to implement policies aimed at promoting economic development and social stability.

China’s authoritarian system has its roots in the country’s imperial past, and has been shaped by the country’s experiences with foreign invasion and occupation. The system has also been influenced by the country’s cultural values, including the emphasis on social harmony and the importance of authority. These values have contributed to the development of a system that prioritizes stability and order over individual freedom and participation.

Despite China’s significant economic and political developments, the West continues to misunderstand China’s intentions and capabilities. This misunderstanding is rooted in a combination of factors:

*a lack of cultural understanding of Chinese history, language, and religions

*a reliance on outdated stereotypes, and

*a failure to recognize the complexities of China’s development.

One of the most significant examples of the West’s misunderstanding of China is the concept of the “China threat.” This concept, which has been perpetuated by Western media and policymakers, suggests that China’s rise is a threat to global stability and security. However, this concept is based on a flawed assumption that China’s intentions are inherently aggressive and expansionist.

In reality, China’s foreign policy is driven by a desire to promote its own economic and security interests, rather than a desire to dominate or threaten other countries. China’s Belt and Road Initiative, for example, is a massive infrastructure project aimed at promoting economic development and cooperation across Asia and Europe. While the initiative has been criticized for its potential to create debt traps and undermine local industries, it is fundamentally a economic development project, rather than a military or strategic initiative.

Another example of the West’s misunderstanding of China is the concept of authoritarianism. While it is true that China’s political system is authoritarian, this concept is often used to imply that China is a repressive and undemocratic society. While the system has its limitations and flaws, it has also been successful in promoting economic development and social stability. While China’s economic growth has been impressive, it has also been accompanied by significant challenges, including rising income inequality, environmental degradation, and labor unrest. These challenges are not unique to China, and are a common feature of developing economies in general.

To improve relations with China, the West must develop a more nuanced and accurate understanding of China’s intentions and capabilities. This requires a willingness to engage with China’s complexities and challenges, rather than relying on simplistic and inaccurate stereotypes. The West must also recognize the many opportunities that China presents, including the potential for economic cooperation, cultural exchange, and strategic partnership. By working together, China and the West can promote mutual understanding and cooperation, and address the many challenges that face the world today.

In order to achieve this, the West must adopt a more pragmatic and flexible approach to China, one that recognizes the complexities and challenges of China’s development. This requires a willingness to engage with China’s leaders and citizens, to listen to their perspectives and concerns, and to work together to address common challenges. By adopting this approach, the West can promote a more constructive and cooperative relationship with China, one that is based on mutual respect and understanding. This relationship can help to promote peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region, and can address the many challenges that face the world today.

China’s economic system is a unique blend of state-led and market-driven elements. In the state-owned enterprise (SOE) sector, the government plays a dominant role, with SOEs contributing significantly to the country’s GDP. However, in the private sector, the state’s role is more limited, with private enterprises also accounting for a substantial share of China’s GDP.

One of China’s most ambitious economic initiatives is the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), a massive infrastructure project aimed at promoting economic development and cooperation across Asia and Europe. The BRI involves investments in transportation networks, energy systems, and other infrastructure projects in over 60 countries. While the initiative has been criticized for its potential to create debt traps and undermine local industries, its primary goal is to stimulate economic growth and cooperation, rather than to pursue mercantilist interests.

China’s economic reforms, launched in the late 1970s, have been significant, transforming the country into the world’s second-largest economy. However, these reforms have also been accompanied by notable challenges, including rising income inequality, environmental degradation, and labor unrest. These issues are not unique to China, but rather common features of many developing economies.

According to official statistics, China’s GDP has grown from $150 billion in 1978 to over $14 trillion in 2020. The country’s economic growth has lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty and created a large middle class. However, the benefits of growth have not been evenly distributed, with income inequality rising in recent years.

China’s economic development has also been marked by significant environmental challenges, including air and water pollution, and the loss of biodiversity. The government has responded by implementing policies aimed at reducing pollution and promoting sustainable development.

In conclusion, China’s economic system is a complex mix of state-led and market-driven elements, with both SOEs and private enterprises playing important roles. The country’s economic development has been marked by significant achievements, but also notable challenges, including rising income inequality and environmental degradation.

Western misunderstandings of China are manifold, limiting opportunities, creating false expectations, and thus exacerbating rather than quelling conflicts. The West’s failure to understand China’s history, culture, and economic development has led to a simplistic and inaccurate view of China, which ignores the many complexities and challenges that China faces alongside a willingness to blithely ignore the consequent limits all that imposes on political reform and economic growth.

The West’s misunderstanding of China is rooted in a lack of cultural understanding, a reliance on outdated stereotypes, and a failure to recognize the complexities of China’s development. This misunderstanding has led to a range of negative consequences, including increased tensions and conflict between China and the West, and a failure to capitalize on the many opportunities that China presents.

To improve relations with China, the West must develop a more nuanced and accurate understanding of China’s history, culture, and economic development. This requires a willingness to engage with China’s complexities and challenges, rather than relying on simplistic and inaccurate stereotypes.

The West must also recognize the many opportunities that China presents, including the potential for economic cooperation, cultural exchange, and strategic partnership. By working together, China and the West can promote mutual understanding and cooperation, and address the many challenges that face the world today.

In order to achieve this, the West must adopt a more pragmatic and flexible approach to China, one that recognizes the complexities and challenges of China’s development. This requires a willingness to engage with China’s leaders and citizens, to listen to their perspectives and concerns, and to work together to address common challenges.

By adopting this approach, the West can promote a more constructive and cooperative relationship with China, one that is based on mutual respect and understanding. This relationship can help to promote peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region, and can address the many challenges that face the world today.

In conclusion, the West’s misunderstanding of China is a significant obstacle to improved relations between China and the West. However, by developing a more nuanced and accurate understanding of China’s history, culture, and economic development, the West can promote a more constructive and cooperative relationship with China, one that is based on mutual respect and understanding.

Recommendations:

Based on the analysis presented in this essay, the following recommendations are made:

1. The West should develop a more nuanced and accurate understanding of China’s history, culture, and economic development.

2. The West should recognize the many opportunities that China presents, including the potential for economic cooperation, cultural exchange, and strategic partnership.

3. The West should adopt a more pragmatic and flexible approach to China, one that recognizes the complexities and challenges of China’s development.

4. The West should engage with China’s leaders and citizens, listen to their perspectives and concerns, and work together to address common challenges.

5. The West should promote a more constructive and cooperative relationship with China, one that is based on mutual respect and understanding.

https://amazon.com/review/create-review?&asin=B0D79QY928

Word of the day: “Victory”

– English: Victory (n)

– French: Victoire (f)

– Spanish: Victoria (f)

– German: Sieg (m)

– Estonian: võit (m)

– Russian: победа (f) *(*pobéda)*

– Ukrainian: перемога (f) *(*peremoha)*

– Mandarin Chinese: 胜利 (*shènglì)*

Sample sentence translated:

– English: Ukraine will win a grand victory.

– French: L’Ukraine remportera une grande victoire.

– Spanish: Ucrania ganará una gran victoria.

– German: Die Ukraine wird einen großen Sieg erringen.

– Estonian: Ukraina võidab suurt võitust.

– Russian: Украина одержит великую победу.

– Ukrainian: Україна здобуде велику перемогу.

– Mandarin Chinese: 乌克兰将赢得伟大的胜利。*(Wūkèlán jiāng yíngdé weidà de shènglì.)*

“Victory” signifies success or superiority in a contest, conflict, or competition.

Final line: We celebrate victories, big and small.

– French: Nous célébrons les victoires, petites et grandes.

– Spanish: Celebramos las victorias, grandes y pequeñas.

– German: Wir feiern Siege, groß und klein.

– Estonian: Me tõstame tervet võidut, väikestest kuni suureni.

– Russian: Мы празднуем победы, большие и малые.

– Ukrainian: Ми святкуємо перемоги, великі й малі.

Something about Kursk got enciphered. You’re welcome.
https://amazon.com/review/create-review?&asin=B0D9C5MKQ7

If you like what I am doing kindly

Share