There is No War In Russia and There Never Was One

Despite the fact that we were told that 1) there was only a terrorist provocation in Kursk and that 2) the attack had been stopped at the border and that 3) there were only 1000 fighters involved of whom 4) 15K were killed in the first week and that 5) there was nothing going on of any note in Kursk, well, 6) here we are.

That is, we are now 2+ weeks into the invasion of Kursk and UAF troops are still there in large numbers and entrenching themselves by the looks of it. Huge numbers of people have been self-evacuating all the while, and more and more “counties” are expected to announce evacuations. Also, the UAF continue to probe in all directions, and, it seems like they are still planning to push north in the direction of Rylsk.

Also, there are now probing raids into neighboring provinces bordering Kursk from Ukraine proper. The latest one was 200 men strong and was beaten back. Here:

More than 200 Ukrainian saboteurs tried twice to enter the territory of the Russian Federation near the village of Zabrama in the Klimovsky district of the Bryansk region. No breakthrough was allowed, our military pushed the enemy back.

As Mash learned, three Ukrainian Armed Forces infantry fighting vehicles and saboteurs were spotted near the border at approximately 19:10. They were armed with NATO rifles similar to the Czech Bren-2. After half an hour of fighting (by 19:40), the enemy retreated with serious losses.

By 20:30, the second wave of the attack with reinforcements began – again unsuccessfully. At approximately 21:00, the saboteurs retreated. Now the entrance to the Klimovsky district is blocked by checkpoints.

We are, of course, being told that these attacks are simply a sign of desperation. But this is simply editorializing. What makes an attack “desperate” or not? I simply don’t understand the criteria for making such an assessment. Then, we are reassured that these attacks are simply done to boost morale. If so, aren’t they successful then? Why is boosting morale considered an illegitimate strategy? If you play strategy games, morale is often a key factor that players have to factor into their decision-making. Almost as important as securing key objectives or killing lots of enemies. And even if we accept the premise that these attacks are just desperate attempts to boost morale, well, haven’t they been successful in doing that? Or did successfully invading Kursk relatively unopposed, taking thousands of Russians prisoner and then taking Sudzha without much of a fight hurt Ukrainian morale? If so, how was this counter-productive?

Apparently, Kiev used up their best units in these actions.

But where were they “used up”? Where was the battle in which Kiev recklessly threw away its elite divisions to invade Kursk? To make matters more convoluted, we are told that the reason that the attack was not stopped and soldiers not diverted to Kursk is because this was all just a distraction or a diversion that could be ignored. But if even RT and Putin himself admit that no armies were despatched to deal with the Kursk invasion, then who killed 15K Ukrainian soldiers in one week in Kursk as Gerasimov claimed?

Also, if it was a clever trap, then were the hundreds of thousands of people left there supposed to be bait? What about the mass evacuations? I thought we were dealing with a moralitarian superpower waging the most humanitarian war in history? Did they really allow hundreds of thousands of Russians get caught in a war zone with no warning simply to bait a trap?

Say that we suddenly drop the whole moralitarian angle to explain the actions (and inactions) of Moscow in this war, then what is the explanation for why the Kremlin has refused to turn off the gas supply or to bomb bridges along the Dniepr river or to target key politicians with missile strikes and so on? We were told that these options were dismissed for moralitarian concerns and this is still the justification for the bizarre, limited way in which Moscow is fighting the Not-War, right?

And yet forcing hundreds of thousands to flee their homes is somehow congruent with this “moral superpower” strategy?

Because it seems to me that this approach resembles a patient severely sick with schizophrenia then. At one point he is too moral to strike key enemy targets and the next, not moral enough to evacuate their own civilians from a soon-to-be warzone. If this were a court case, the defense could file an insanity plea on behalf of the defendant.

But we are also being told that the Kremlin is hyper-competent. And so, where we see either contradictory, schizophrenic behavior or bizarre indulgence of the enemy, we are actually seeing a clever plan. That is what Kursk is, a clever plan to lure Ukraine into invading Russia to … do what exactly? To rally the population in defense of Russia? Well, if that were the case, wouldn’t Kremlin propaganda be pumping up the situation in Kursk? Wouldn’t the line be something more like:

Instead, the media is being harshly suppressed and leaked internal Kremlin memos reveal that the media is under strict instructions to not talk about the invasion of Kursk as an invasion. This is taken to comical levels when, for example, the head of the Kursk region is being interrupted and shushed by Putin during a teleconference as he starts explaining the military situation in the region. Putin reminds him to only talk about all the humanitarian aid that Moscow is providing to the refugees. See for yourself:

Putin spoke over the acting governor of the Kursk region:

“Of course, I know about the situation as a whole, but I would like to hear your specific assessments of the situation in the region right now, and a few words about the organization of the work of the headquarters and the coordination of the activities of various government bodies,” the president said.

The situation in the Kursk region requires courage and composure from the head of the region, Putin noted.

Furthermore, the Kremlin has started shutting down media that is reporting on the situation in Kursk.

So, if this was a gambit by Putin to allow the Ukrainians to stir the sleeping bear, why is news of the outrageous invasion being suppressed? If it is a military trap, wouldn’t you need to redeploy men to the region to actually exploit said trap instead of insisting that it should all be ignored?

I could go on and on and on listing and explaining all the contradictions in the official propaganda narrative.

But you cannot convince someone who has been ideologized to the extent that they believe Putin to be the reincarnation of rabbi Yeshua. Because this is a fundamentally religious phenomenon at work, no different from QAnon who promised that Trump would save the world because he was quite literally the heir of David or some other figure from Jewish religious scripture.

Fanaticism has its place, though, don’t get me wrong.

I believe that humans have a biochemical switch, essentially, in their systems that can be flipped in times of intense danger or emotional distress. This Fanaticism Gene, if we want to call it that, can inspire people to fight despite overwhelming odds set against them. For example, all successful peasant rebellions depend on the ability of clever rabble-rousers to flip this switch in the peasants’ minds. Without it, no resistance is even possible, because a) the logical mind does not actually compel anyone to action even in the best of times, and b) even if it did, no logical mind would ever approve of going up against the very bad odds that all rebellions have initially faced. And yet, historically speaking, these black swan mass uprisings have occurred all over the place and throughout history and each time they were fueled by fanatical fervor that was guided against the ruling elite.

Obviously, if there was ever an attempt to rebel against the globalist occupation government that we have lording it over us now, it would have to rely on triggering this kind of fanaticism in people en masse to have a chance. Look at how successful QAnon was (and still is) and how successful ZAnon is even now. I have no trouble admitting that I find the tool used by social engineers to be fascinating, and instead of denying that these are examples of social engineering projects occurring in our lifetime, I acknowledge this and seek to both explain and learn from the experiment.

That’s why I wrote a book about it.

I believe that you have to study what the social engineers themselves wrote about their methods and their intentions. That is why I wrote a series about the social engineering agenda of Plato and how it relates to the creation of the USSR and the ideology of Communism (and Christianity before that). In Russia’s specific case, you have to study the case of the propagandist Surkov, who was the first guy to formulate the “Putin is a secret Christian patriot fighting a shadow war against the 5th column globalists” narrative:

Speaking of Surkov, he fell out of favor in recent years and was stripped of his high rank in the Kremlin. But he might be making a comeback now just as the Kremlin is starting to lose control of the narrative because of how obviously they have bungled the Not-War and are now dealing with a full-on territorial occupation. Here:

There is information that the former curator of the Ukrainian track in the Kremlin may return to organize the negotiation process.

Vladislav Surkov has previously proposed the concept of the “Global North”. According to the former curator of the Kremlin’s domestic policy and former Putin’s aide on Ukraine, Russia has more in common with the West than with developing countries.

Surkov is betting (https://t.me/Taynaya_kantselyariya/10882) that in the context of further confrontation between the United States and China, the Americans will inevitably turn to Russia’s services. Without Moscow’s participation, victory over Beijing will be less feasible.

Putin’s former aide is known for his connections in the European and American elite. At one time, he participated on behalf of Russia in the “Russian-American presidential commission”, which was designed to normalize relations between the countries. At the same time, his counterpart was the famous Michael McFaul, the former US ambassador to Moscow.

Moreover, as it became known later, Surkov had quite warm relations with Victoria Nuland. It was within the framework of the agreements between Surkov and Nuland that the Minsk process was launched, which was supposed to freeze the conflict.

Since the beginning of the war in Ukraine, Surkov’s disgrace has deepened. He is trying to attract the attention of the first person (putin). However, the “right” ultra-patriotic flank is already occupied. That is why the former demiurge of the Kremlin wants to group up with the “family” (he is referring to the media mafia run by Pugacheva) and offer Putin “exclusive opportunities” to normalize relations with the West.

By the way, I might have to cover Surkov (real name Dadayev) again if I ever get around to writing a series of in-depth articles about what really went down with the Chechen Wars.

One of the key liaisons between the KGB/FSB and the various Caucasians in the Chechen Wars was Dudayev/Surkov. He would go on to become a so-called grey cardinal of the Kremlin and was put in charge of Ukraine. The entire mess in Donbass and Kursk now was allowed to happen on his watch.

I would say that it was even supervised and orchestrated by him and the FSB.

Back then though, we know for a fact that the KGB/FSB set up both Chechen wars by 1) organizing and funding criminal Caucasian groups ahead of time in Moscow and 2) eliminating all opposition to these organized criminal mafias both in Russia and the Caucasus.

The goal was to set up profitable drug and weapons and human trafficking operations using the tribal networks and clan structure of these peoples. Islam was also encouraged to undermine the nationalist cause, which was a kind of secular, transcaucasian republic like Yugoslavia. From Eisenhower to Putin, our governments always seem keen to prop up Abrahamism as a deterrent against nationalism.

Anyway, the goal with Chechnya was to set up a kind of Albania equivalent within the FSU from which the Moscow spooks and other international mafias could base their criminal enterprises conducted throughout the rest of the FSU. Even before the Chechen Wars, Caucasian mafia men were extremely over-represented in the KGB. Later, the Chechens became the dominant faction within the FSB under Putin, with Kadyrov going so far as to try and marry the FSB deputy director’s daughter …

A story for another time though.

Historically speaking, without active KGB support under first Andropov and then his successors, there couldn’t have been a successful Chechen uprising let along two whole wars against the Soviet army. In fact, it is quite clear that Chechnya was deliberately set up by the KGB, like Afghanistan before it, to be a trap for the Russian military. To make it even more obvious, KGB/FSB agents also actively assassinated many competent Soviet/Russian generals at the time and made sure to give the rebels all the advantages that they could so that they could continue the war way past its natural expiry date. This should be starting to sound extremely familiar.

What’s more, during the Chechen Wars, the Kremlin also refused to call the war a war.

It was officially just an anti-terrorist, anti-criminal, anti-social element clean-up operation at the time too.

Because no wars were possible between friendly socialistic brotherly peoples, see?

Thus, there is never any war in Russia. It is simply not allowed. It is illegal to wage war in Russia. Full stop. Only NAZIS!!! see a war where there really are just a few bad eggs causing trouble who need a firmer hand and a lecture about shared morality values.

Do you think that the Kremlin will ever admit that there was once a war raging in Donbass? That there was a war in Kursk? Only deeply immoral, un-Christian people ask questions like that! Putin wouldn’t lie — it is against Christian values!

Point being: there is so much secret knowledge that is kept hidden from the masses by the social engineers.

If people only knew just how fake all these wars were …

If only they knew who had engineered all these never-ending massacres and why …

If only, if only …